If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
I will continue to "whore" out my talents to relay teams that are the most fun to be with..... this means swimming with old friends.
Back to the topic Mr. Geek. What would happen if USMS had the guts to tell FINA to "pound sand" on this rubber suit issue?
John Smith
And what really cracks me up is you two idiots swimming on Rowdy's team this fall....talk about whores!! JS, do you an extra Mark Spitz Stars & Stripes Speedo you can loan your little buddy?
Even more important is will Geekster pony up the $100 entry/winner take all "retro" 50 back event you're organizing?
"retro" = comy goggles, toes over the edge start, no SDK and John Naber "bucket turns"?
I will continue to "whore" out my talents to relay teams that are the most fun to be with..... this means swimming with old friends.
Back to the topic Mr. Geek. What would happen if USMS had the guts to tell FINA to "pound sand" on this rubber suit issue?
John Smith
And what really cracks me up is you two idiots swimming on Rowdy's team this fall....talk about whores!! JS, do you an extra Mark Spitz Stars & Stripes Speedo you can loan your little buddy?
Even more important is will Geekster pony up the $100 entry/winner take all "retro" 50 back event you're organizing?
"retro" = comy goggles, toes over the edge start, no SDK and John Naber "bucket turns"?
