If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
But really, Kirk,........ it's just masters swimming. Perhaps you need to join Paul and I for a beer next nationals.
You're on. But which one am I? Obama, Gates or Crowley? :)
And by the way, what's your take John? You've hinted that you think masters swimmers should be able to do whatever they want, but you also said you'd like the whole rubber suit chapter eliminated from the sport. Let's hear your definitive answer to your own question.
But really, Kirk,........ it's just masters swimming. Perhaps you need to join Paul and I for a beer next nationals.
You're on. But which one am I? Obama, Gates or Crowley? :)
And by the way, what's your take John? You've hinted that you think masters swimmers should be able to do whatever they want, but you also said you'd like the whole rubber suit chapter eliminated from the sport. Let's hear your definitive answer to your own question.
