If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
I think if we allow the suits and everyone else bans them then it turns USMS into the equivalent of a beer league. Maybe some people think this is fine, but not me. Why is this such a big deal? I like wearing paddles in practice, too, but I'm not advocating their use in meets. The sport has become a laughingstock due to these suits.
I think if we allow the suits and everyone else bans them then it turns USMS into the equivalent of a beer league. Maybe some people think this is fine, but not me. Why is this such a big deal? I like wearing paddles in practice, too, but I'm not advocating their use in meets. The sport has become a laughingstock due to these suits.
