Since there has been observation on this forum that most younger female (not male) swimmers at Nationals wore non-tech suits (the 18-24 and 25-29 groups), I'm curious as to why.
Anyone of that younger group look at this board and care to post reasons? Cost? Controversy over "authenticity" of times when fastest suits are banned? Desire to look hot for guys, as one poster suggests?
Back at least somewhat toward the topic . . . at Clovis, like-minded lascivious Cro-Magnon cave dwellers and I voted Nike tanks as the best suit cut for young pups. I'm guessing the suits are as fast as any other non-tech tank, but the cuts were superior -- at least in the criteria that mattered to us.
B70s can be quite flattering as well, especially when the viewer of the B70-clad subject is lost in the fog of a good endorphin buzz.
Back at least somewhat toward the topic . . . at Clovis, like-minded lascivious Cro-Magnon cave dwellers and I voted Nike tanks as the best suit cut for young pups. I'm guessing the suits are as fast as any other non-tech tank, but the cuts were superior -- at least in the criteria that mattered to us.
B70s can be quite flattering as well, especially when the viewer of the B70-clad subject is lost in the fog of a good endorphin buzz.
