In Pacific, we only count times swum in Pacific sanctioned meets for our Top Tens and Records.
I was wondering if your LMSC counts times swum at Nationals, or in other LMSCs, in your LMSC tabulations?
This has always been frustrating for me, especially during LC season, as we usually only have one or two meets. Last year and this year we had one meet, our LC championships! I would love to be able to have Nationals times count, and/or be able to enter meets in other LMSCs and have the times count in Pacific tabulations.
If you respond, could you tell me what LMSC you're in? I'm going to present "my case" at our May meeting.
Thanks : ]
Thanks, Jim. These lists illustrate my second point: so many of them have fewer than ten names that it hardly seems worth the effort to compile or distribute them. You might sweep in a few more people (like Karen, in her late-90s example) by including non-Pacific meets, but it still would seem to me to be a low priority compared to, say, keeping the local records up to date or getting a few more LCM meets on the schedule in the first place.
I think that if people aren't making the list when there are local meets to compete in, the numbers aren't probably going to go up significantly with meets-at-a-distance included, with the possible exception of Nat's. But, yes, it might get a couple more.
Thanks, Jim. These lists illustrate my second point: so many of them have fewer than ten names that it hardly seems worth the effort to compile or distribute them. You might sweep in a few more people (like Karen, in her late-90s example) by including non-Pacific meets, but it still would seem to me to be a low priority compared to, say, keeping the local records up to date or getting a few more LCM meets on the schedule in the first place.
I think that if people aren't making the list when there are local meets to compete in, the numbers aren't probably going to go up significantly with meets-at-a-distance included, with the possible exception of Nat's. But, yes, it might get a couple more.
