I have been back swimming for several years. In that time I have mostly worked out alone, but sometimes swim with a group of people, one of whom has competed in masters meets on and off for years.
I used to be exclusively a freestyle sprinter, but out of boredom I started swimming IM. Last year swam my first 200 IM in competition, which hurt like hell but I got a bang out of it. Anyway I've been working on my fly on and off, and was stupid enough to mention to one of my workout buddies that I'd considered working up to the 100 fly as my next challenge.
He suggested a 400 yard fly set: 1x100, 2x50, 1x50+2x25, 4x25. I actually managed to do this three times in one week, but sort of crashed the next week--probably pushed it too hard. But for the first time in my life I actually swam 100 fly, and did so legally. (My 50 hovers at 32; I tried to negative split it the first time, and went 45 and 45 plus three seconds hanging on the wall at the 75 for a 1:33!)
Anyway I am swimming in a meet this weekend, and when I sent in my entry I totally chickened out and did not enter the 100 fly, which was right after the 50 free, which I also often swim.
I saw my friend Bill at the pool two days later and he asked about my events for said meet. I told him, and he nodded. "No 100 fly?" he asked. I said nope, maybe next meet. He nodded again and left for the post-workout hot tub. Ten minutes later he came back as I was finishing some 25s of fly at the end of my swim. He smiled and said, "I want you to know that I say this in the best possible way and from the bottom of my heart, but your failure to enter the 100 fly this weekend is the single most cowardly act in the history of competitive swimming."
I laughed, of course. But then I went home and emailed the meet director. I'm in. I sent in a seed time of 1:30 to guarantee that I could avoid a fast heat. God help me.
A diabolical taunt, don't you think?
Great job! For a 50 of 30.94, textbook ideal splitting for the 100 would be something like 31.94 + 33.94 = 1:05.88. So a goal of 1:06 to 1:07 is doable but aggressive. (Almost no one can attain ideal splitting like that; I certainly haven't)
I disagree that a differential of 2.0 sec is ideal in the 100 fly. The first 50 benefits from a start (say 1.5 sec) and the 2nd 50 is disadvantaged because of the open turn (say 1.0 sec from the time your hand hits to when your feet leave the wall).
So even without fatigue you are talking about 2.5 sec difference. Even when I feel pretty strong on the 2nd half I usually have about a 3.0-3.2 sec difference. (Compare this to a typical 1.0-1.5 diff in backstroke for me: less advantage on the start, and a foot touch on the first 50.)
I agree that for the first 50, a well-trained masters swimmer should be about 1.0 sec from his top speed 50 in the 100 fly. The elite swimmers (Phelps et al) will be closer than that.
Great job! For a 50 of 30.94, textbook ideal splitting for the 100 would be something like 31.94 + 33.94 = 1:05.88. So a goal of 1:06 to 1:07 is doable but aggressive. (Almost no one can attain ideal splitting like that; I certainly haven't)
I disagree that a differential of 2.0 sec is ideal in the 100 fly. The first 50 benefits from a start (say 1.5 sec) and the 2nd 50 is disadvantaged because of the open turn (say 1.0 sec from the time your hand hits to when your feet leave the wall).
So even without fatigue you are talking about 2.5 sec difference. Even when I feel pretty strong on the 2nd half I usually have about a 3.0-3.2 sec difference. (Compare this to a typical 1.0-1.5 diff in backstroke for me: less advantage on the start, and a foot touch on the first 50.)
I agree that for the first 50, a well-trained masters swimmer should be about 1.0 sec from his top speed 50 in the 100 fly. The elite swimmers (Phelps et al) will be closer than that.
