The Swimming World magazine have posted this article, www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/.../20390.asp
LAUSANNE, Switzerland, February 19. IN an attempt to have a united front on what possible changes they are willing to have enacted with regard to speedsuits, suit manufacturers got together for a meeting today in Switzerland, according to Tony Austin of the SCAQ Blog.
Without working together, there was a definite possibility that the powers working against speedsuits continuing in the sport altogether could have capitalized on a split agenda by the various competing manufacturers.
According to Austin's reporting, the manufacturers have agreed to a game plan heading into tomorrow's meeting. The restrictions they are willing to agree to immediately without any fight are "a de facto buoyancy test, suit thickness guidelines, a rule to ban multiple suits and/or duct tape ‘mods' and most importantly clear cut rules so that suit innovation can take place without the fear of a nebulous interpretation wiping out bundles of money in R&D expenses at the last minute."
Tomorrow, the official recommendation that will be put in front of the FINA congress will be hammered out.
Full text of the blog posting.
Look like a compromise will be the probable outcome from this mess about Tech-suits.
The Manufactures are in too strong positions to accept a complete ban at top level, too much money is on the stake, so they're showing all together to force the hand to FINA with a common position, with minor changes.
All the swimming's world needed money from major sponsors, and The tech suits are a great source of profit.
The overall performance are improved too much in a blink at every level to even think that the suit don't affect the performance in pool, and if they affect the performance by rule they'd be banned period.
But for me it's too late and too much to loose for nearly everybody to return to speedoo.
It's ironic that multiple suits are accepted to be banned because help the swimmers, but if multiple suits helps then every single suit must help at little bit, even one alone only, otherwise it's a nosense in first place. So why banned multiple suite if the suit don't help buoyance ?
Parents
Former Member
One of my students swims summer rec and I also swim Masters with his dad. I was showing him the article. He asked me about the thickness of the B70. I didn't know the answer. Is it more than 1mm? Clemmons, you there?
BTW, it just struck me, a LZR and a B70 together- that's some cha-ching!
One more thing: I read that article, that I think Ande posted, about the Aussie girl 200 flyer and how she didn't wear a new tech suit at their Oly Trials, and didn't make it in her "sure thing" event. What were her coaches thinking?! She got some horrible advice. And I don't know how old she is, but didn't it occur to her, at all, that if all of these other swimmers are wearing them there must be a reason?!
OK, two more things: It says the suit can't go past the ankle. When I wore a B70 it was below my calf, but above my ankle. Are they talking about banning leg suits? I'm a little confused I guess.
Hi all, Back form Switzerland, and thought I would throw an answer or two in for you.
the blueseventy compostie material DRST is not neoprene (just to clarify this for all) and the total thickness of the material is 0.3mm, well below the legal limit proposed of 1.0mm.
Having been a part of the process and been in attendance in Lausanne yesterday I can confirm on behalf of blueseventy that we and the other brands are delighted with the outcome and we now have (Subject to Dubai meeting ratification) a set of rules that we can work to use to define our on going technologies.
Our suit IS Legal, always HAS been legal and WILL continue to be legal. This we are of course not too suprised, as we have always maintained a postion of working within the rules of FINA.
Any questions, then please do drop me a message.
Deano
blueseventy Marketing Director.
One of my students swims summer rec and I also swim Masters with his dad. I was showing him the article. He asked me about the thickness of the B70. I didn't know the answer. Is it more than 1mm? Clemmons, you there?
BTW, it just struck me, a LZR and a B70 together- that's some cha-ching!
One more thing: I read that article, that I think Ande posted, about the Aussie girl 200 flyer and how she didn't wear a new tech suit at their Oly Trials, and didn't make it in her "sure thing" event. What were her coaches thinking?! She got some horrible advice. And I don't know how old she is, but didn't it occur to her, at all, that if all of these other swimmers are wearing them there must be a reason?!
OK, two more things: It says the suit can't go past the ankle. When I wore a B70 it was below my calf, but above my ankle. Are they talking about banning leg suits? I'm a little confused I guess.
Hi all, Back form Switzerland, and thought I would throw an answer or two in for you.
the blueseventy compostie material DRST is not neoprene (just to clarify this for all) and the total thickness of the material is 0.3mm, well below the legal limit proposed of 1.0mm.
Having been a part of the process and been in attendance in Lausanne yesterday I can confirm on behalf of blueseventy that we and the other brands are delighted with the outcome and we now have (Subject to Dubai meeting ratification) a set of rules that we can work to use to define our on going technologies.
Our suit IS Legal, always HAS been legal and WILL continue to be legal. This we are of course not too suprised, as we have always maintained a postion of working within the rules of FINA.
Any questions, then please do drop me a message.
Deano
blueseventy Marketing Director.