In the “Readers Ask” section on page 11 of the latest issue of USMS Swimmer (as shown on the home page of this site), there is a question about the use of paddles.
The reply (from Randy Nutt of the Boca and Gold Coast Masters) says something to the effect that “……..Paddles increase distance per stroke and enable the swimmer to achieve some very fast speeds in a work out”.
As I’ve said repeatedly, the main problem in swimming is how to get more propulsion –not reduce drag- and paddles and flippers provide the most drastic improvement in speed.
So here’s the $64,000 question: If FINA allows the use of so called tech suits which increase speed by purportedly reducing drag, why aren’t paddles and flippers (which increase speed through enhanced propulsion) also allowed? :confused:
Dolphin 2
Parents
Former Member
I like my fins for pulling. I like my paddles for finding slippage and splashy entry...that's about it.
Goggles may have revolutionised the sport but at $13 for 3 pairs at costco...it's not quite the $ hit as a top suit.
That said IDC about whether there are suits at masters meets...if grown adults want to spend thousands a year to delude themselves about how fast/efficient they are, then that is their call.
I do think suits should be restricted for children and young adults so that the less fortunate may still be able to play on a level surface...although likelihood is if the parents can pay for swim team, they can probably afford a suit...but is it a necessary thing to have in age group?
Yes, life is not fair, life is hard, life kicks you in the groin many, many times...life always wins. However, sometimes we can act to help remedy situations where unfairness may exist. Soup kitchens, battered womens shelters, no euthanising animal pounds, or maybe by not using PEDs in a sport/league without testing to come expose you (COUGH, COUGH)...
:bolt:
I like my fins for pulling. I like my paddles for finding slippage and splashy entry...that's about it.
Goggles may have revolutionised the sport but at $13 for 3 pairs at costco...it's not quite the $ hit as a top suit.
That said IDC about whether there are suits at masters meets...if grown adults want to spend thousands a year to delude themselves about how fast/efficient they are, then that is their call.
I do think suits should be restricted for children and young adults so that the less fortunate may still be able to play on a level surface...although likelihood is if the parents can pay for swim team, they can probably afford a suit...but is it a necessary thing to have in age group?
Yes, life is not fair, life is hard, life kicks you in the groin many, many times...life always wins. However, sometimes we can act to help remedy situations where unfairness may exist. Soup kitchens, battered womens shelters, no euthanising animal pounds, or maybe by not using PEDs in a sport/league without testing to come expose you (COUGH, COUGH)...
:bolt:
