Today, these forumites showed how the 200 fly is done. The difference between the 100's is key. Good job! (And as always, I hope I didn't miss anyone)
3 Nelson, Kirk 38 PNA 2:06.72 2:04.68 (5.88)
27.97 59.40 (31.43)
1:32.23 (32.83) 2:04.68 (32.45)
7 Jackson, Keith 46 CVAS 2:10.90 2:14.70 (5.28)
30.32 1:04.71 (34.39)
1:39.89 (35.18) 2:14.70 (34.81)
3 Stark, Allen 60 OREG 2:44.37 2:43.27 (1.67)
37.94 1:20.80 (42.86)
2:02.66 (41.86) 2:43.27 (40.61)
5 Duggan, Karen 38 WCM 2:40.00 2:32.32 (6.76)
33.60 1:12.78 (39.18)
1:52.83 (40.05) 2:32.32 (39.49)
6 Casey, Kathrine 60 PNA 3:50.67 3:48.41 (4.93)
51.51 1:51.74 (1:00.23)
2:52.57 (1:00.83) 3:48.41 (55.84)
Here's two unusual sets of splits...
2 Rudloff, Edward 61 TOC 2:35.70 2:28.48 (0.82)
34.39 1:13.83 (39.44)
1:54.04 (40.21) 2:28.48 (34.44)
1 Fasbender, Barry 71 STAN 3:13.37 3:14.96 (-2.06)
45.26 1:38.51 (53.25)
2:31.22 (52.71) 3:14.96 (43.74)
But there was some piano precipitation down there in Clovis. This is just a sampling, with names changed to protect the wounded. It hurts just reading some of these!
7 Steinway, Erik 29 ETEX 2:27.22 2:17.10 (14.82)
28.48 1:01.14 (32.66)
1:36.98 (35.84) 2:17.10 (40.12)
9 Wurlitzer, Brian 30 IM 2:09.95 2:15.99 (11.73)
29.05 1:02.13 (33.08)
1:37.64 (35.51) 2:15.99 (38.35)
10 Casio, Stephen 44 WCM 2:06.90 2:06.61 (11.85)
26.53 57.38 (30.85)
1:29.21 (31.83) 2:06.61 (37.40)
14 Yamaha, Raymond 44 WH2O 2:35.00 2:43.29 (16.83)
34.12 1:13.23 (39.11)
1:56.16 (42.93) 2:43.29 (47.13)
15 Vogel & Sohn, Michael 43 PNA 3:10.00 3:20.05 (18.25)
41.27 1:30.90 (49.63)
2:23.87 (52.97) 3:20.05 (56.18)
8 Harpsichord, Donald 50 AAAA 2:14.79 2:23.75 (17.51)
29.31 1:03.12 (33.81)
1:41.14 (38.02) 2:23.75 (42.61)
10 Babygrand, Kerry 52 WCM 2:25.00 3:07.45 (:confused:)
25.95 55.86 (29.91)
1:18.53 (22.67) 3:07.45 (1:48.92)
-- Ouch, Margaret 37 CHIC 2:18.40 DNF (:sad:)
30.34 1:03.92 (33.58)
1:55.07 (51.15)
The second to last one looks like a problem with the timing system. The last one... maybe she requested an official split of her first 100, but then didn't finish the second 100.
Today, these forumites showed how the 200 fly is done. The difference between the 100's is key. Good job! (And as always, I hope I didn't miss anyone)
3 Nelson, Kirk 38 PNA 2:06.72 2:04.68 (5.88)
27.97 59.40 (31.43)
1:32.23 (32.83) 2:04.68 (32.45)
7 Jackson, Keith 46 CVAS 2:10.90 2:14.70 (5.28)
30.32 1:04.71 (34.39)
1:39.89 (35.18) 2:14.70 (34.81)
3 Stark, Allen 60 OREG 2:44.37 2:43.27 (1.67)
37.94 1:20.80 (42.86)
2:02.66 (41.86) 2:43.27 (40.61)
5 Duggan, Karen 38 WCM 2:40.00 2:32.32 (6.76)
33.60 1:12.78 (39.18)
1:52.83 (40.05) 2:32.32 (39.49)
6 Casey, Kathrine 60 PNA 3:50.67 3:48.41 (4.93)
51.51 1:51.74 (1:00.23)
2:52.57 (1:00.83) 3:48.41 (55.84)
Here's two unusual sets of splits...
2 Rudloff, Edward 61 TOC 2:35.70 2:28.48 (0.82)
34.39 1:13.83 (39.44)
1:54.04 (40.21) 2:28.48 (34.44)
1 Fasbender, Barry 71 STAN 3:13.37 3:14.96 (-2.06)
45.26 1:38.51 (53.25)
2:31.22 (52.71) 3:14.96 (43.74)
But there was some piano precipitation down there in Clovis. This is just a sampling, with names changed to protect the wounded. It hurts just reading some of these!
7 Steinway, Erik 29 ETEX 2:27.22 2:17.10 (14.82)
28.48 1:01.14 (32.66)
1:36.98 (35.84) 2:17.10 (40.12)
9 Wurlitzer, Brian 30 IM 2:09.95 2:15.99 (11.73)
29.05 1:02.13 (33.08)
1:37.64 (35.51) 2:15.99 (38.35)
10 Casio, Stephen 44 WCM 2:06.90 2:06.61 (11.85)
26.53 57.38 (30.85)
1:29.21 (31.83) 2:06.61 (37.40)
14 Yamaha, Raymond 44 WH2O 2:35.00 2:43.29 (16.83)
34.12 1:13.23 (39.11)
1:56.16 (42.93) 2:43.29 (47.13)
15 Vogel & Sohn, Michael 43 PNA 3:10.00 3:20.05 (18.25)
41.27 1:30.90 (49.63)
2:23.87 (52.97) 3:20.05 (56.18)
8 Harpsichord, Donald 50 AAAA 2:14.79 2:23.75 (17.51)
29.31 1:03.12 (33.81)
1:41.14 (38.02) 2:23.75 (42.61)
10 Babygrand, Kerry 52 WCM 2:25.00 3:07.45 (:confused:)
25.95 55.86 (29.91)
1:18.53 (22.67) 3:07.45 (1:48.92)
-- Ouch, Margaret 37 CHIC 2:18.40 DNF (:sad:)
30.34 1:03.92 (33.58)
1:55.07 (51.15)
The second to last one looks like a problem with the timing system. The last one... maybe she requested an official split of her first 100, but then didn't finish the second 100.
