Split requests seem to be all the fashion lately. I know they're perfectly legal, though I haven't read the rule itself. I'm wondering about them though ... It seems oddly unfair, for example, that a person never (or rarely) swimming open 50s could hold world or national records or #1 rankings in those events. (I'm just saying it's odd, while recognizing it could be perfectly legal.) But, aside from that and further, what if someone really played the system. What if, for example, someone was after a 50 free record. They entered a meet in the 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 free and led off free relays and requested split requests in each event to try to set a record. Is this legitimate or legal? Would a meet director be bound to accept split requests for all these events? Is there a limit? Do meet directors have discretion to deny multiple split requests? I can see a situation where multiple attempts at a 50 might result in a better time ...
Not an issue. Remember that swimmers trying to make cuts (particularly in USS and college) will do time trials after meets or even meets composed entirely of time trials. In college, on three separate occasions, I swam 200 fly time trials alone to make cuts. Another time I did a 1000 free time trial alone, and was so bored that I missed the cut I was trying to make.
Edit: Now that I think about it, I also did several other time trial swims just to see how fast I could go in some of my "off" events.
At least in my mind, there's a difference between looking for a cut and setting a world record. Wasn't there some controversy a while back about a 50 free record being set in a trial? Maybe Hall, Jr was involved, I can't recall right now? Something about an empty lane between 2 very fast guys?
Not an issue. Remember that swimmers trying to make cuts (particularly in USS and college) will do time trials after meets or even meets composed entirely of time trials. In college, on three separate occasions, I swam 200 fly time trials alone to make cuts. Another time I did a 1000 free time trial alone, and was so bored that I missed the cut I was trying to make.
Edit: Now that I think about it, I also did several other time trial swims just to see how fast I could go in some of my "off" events.
At least in my mind, there's a difference between looking for a cut and setting a world record. Wasn't there some controversy a while back about a 50 free record being set in a trial? Maybe Hall, Jr was involved, I can't recall right now? Something about an empty lane between 2 very fast guys?
