Let's keep cutting men's sports. Hey.... it's the economy now, not Title IX.
I find this reasoning amusing.
John Smith
=======================================
NCAA's Brand: Don't fault Title IX for Future Cuts
Author: ASA News
Blog URL: allstudentathletes.com/.../ncaabrandtitleix
Description:
Brand expects some schools to drop men's teams in coming months because
of the economic downturn. He is urging them in advance to cite the
economy, not the law that bans sex discrimination at schools receiving
federal funds.
From the article you cited, Paul (www.lewrockwell.com/.../epstein12.html):
While Gavora is excellent at identifying the symptoms, she comes up short with the cause and the cure. Gavora would be fairly characterized as a moderate feminist. While deploring radical feminists, she praises Berry Friedman’s The Feminine Mystique and generally sees the changing sex roles of women since the 1950s as a positive development. Therefore, she considers Title IX and other anti-discrimination measures to guarantee women equal footing with men as necessary. Gavora views the outrages that are thoroughly detailed in her book as unintended consequences of Title IX.
This is all I'm trying to say.
From the article you cited, Paul (www.lewrockwell.com/.../epstein12.html):
While Gavora is excellent at identifying the symptoms, she comes up short with the cause and the cure. Gavora would be fairly characterized as a moderate feminist. While deploring radical feminists, she praises Berry Friedman’s The Feminine Mystique and generally sees the changing sex roles of women since the 1950s as a positive development. Therefore, she considers Title IX and other anti-discrimination measures to guarantee women equal footing with men as necessary. Gavora views the outrages that are thoroughly detailed in her book as unintended consequences of Title IX.
This is all I'm trying to say.
