Let's keep cutting men's sports. Hey.... it's the economy now, not Title IX.
I find this reasoning amusing.
John Smith
=======================================
NCAA's Brand: Don't fault Title IX for Future Cuts
Author: ASA News
Blog URL: allstudentathletes.com/.../ncaabrandtitleix
Description:
Brand expects some schools to drop men's teams in coming months because
of the economic downturn. He is urging them in advance to cite the
economy, not the law that bans sex discrimination at schools receiving
federal funds.
I think hoping that AD's will give less scholarships for football players is unrealistic. Since the time of the gladiators, the mob has enjoyed seeing people get mauled. Those in power love to please the mob. The mob wants football and the best that can be had.
So, giving half of the athletic money to half of the athletic population is unfair if the (predominantly male) mob demands otherwise? I'm not asking what can or will happen. I'm asking what's fair. If men choose to give their half of the resources to football, women should be satisfied with less than half? Really???
I think hoping that AD's will give less scholarships for football players is unrealistic. Since the time of the gladiators, the mob has enjoyed seeing people get mauled. Those in power love to please the mob. The mob wants football and the best that can be had.
So, giving half of the athletic money to half of the athletic population is unfair if the (predominantly male) mob demands otherwise? I'm not asking what can or will happen. I'm asking what's fair. If men choose to give their half of the resources to football, women should be satisfied with less than half? Really???
