I am just back from the SPMA meet where all the top finisher were wearing the latest generation tech suits,mostly B-70s(or were named Jeff Commings.)I have here to for been in favor of the suits,but now I am not so sure.First,they eliminate the old bench marks.I went my fastest 100m BR in 5 yr in my LZR,but it was only .3 sec faster than I did untapered 5 wk earlier in my first swim in the LZR.So was my swim good or not,I'm not sure.Also,instead of focusing on technique or pace I found myself ruminating over aspects of the suits,how many more swims did the suit have,is it the right size,was the reason I didn't get better results from my B-70 because it was too big?etc.The B-70 has somewhat mitigated the "too expensive,not durable" problem,but for how long.
Lets say a company comes up with a suit that is much faster,say 4 sec/100.Further that it is very expensive(say $1000) lasts 4 swims and is very hard to make so that quantities are always limited and the fastest way to get one is to bid up to $3000 on ebay. Now lets say your nemesis has one,or that getting one is your best chance to get TT or AA or a ZR or WR,or that your child is close to making JO cuts,or finally beating his/her nemesis etc. Is it worth it and where does it stop?
Former Member
Bias revealed: I am for wooden bats and technical swim suits because A) I don't play baseball myself but like to think today's game still has something in common with Abner Doubleday's vision, and B) I do swim and want every possible advantage I can get, and C) I am a hypocrite.
To quote another;
"This is a good post, really good."
The Major League baseball bat. Wood or aluminum?
Open your blue books. You have 90 minutes to complete your essay.
Good luck. Begin.
If they ever switched to aluminum bats, I would quit watching. The only reason I don't enjoy college baseball more is that not-quite-right sound...tink!
The wooden Louisville slugger is traditional.
The aluminum Easton pinger is a technological improvement, at least for batters and bat purchasers--the ball goes farther, and the bats are almost impossible to break. Pitchers may not like them because a hard drive off an aluminum bat screaming to the head is more likely to result in premature death.
Essay question Part B:
Is it possible to be FOR wooden baseball bats and also FOR technical swimming suits and not be in some sense hypocritical?
Open your second blue book.
Begin.
Bias revealed: I am for wooden bats and technical swim suits because A) I don't play baseball myself but like to think today's game still has something in common with Abner Doubleday's vision, and B) I do swim and want every possible advantage I can get, and C) I am a hypocrite.
This is the point that gets at me in the debate over suits. We already have this situation without any tech suits. Big deal. All women wear body suits every time they swim (well, every time they swim in a sanctioned competition at least). They are free to wear them as tight as they like. Do you really think that some women don't benefit more from wearing a tight fitting standard competition suit than others? They are all different body types :applaud:. Without getting too graphic here, I've noticed that some of them are a bit lumpier than others. I would think that a standard suit is much more of an advantage to that type of swimmer. Why is it such a crime when men wear the same types of suits? Discrimination?
Because a situation already exists to some degree (and for women only), it should be made worse? Sorry, I think people with beer guts should pay the price in the pool rather than in the swim shop.
