I am just back from the SPMA meet where all the top finisher were wearing the latest generation tech suits,mostly B-70s(or were named Jeff Commings.)I have here to for been in favor of the suits,but now I am not so sure.First,they eliminate the old bench marks.I went my fastest 100m BR in 5 yr in my LZR,but it was only .3 sec faster than I did untapered 5 wk earlier in my first swim in the LZR.So was my swim good or not,I'm not sure.Also,instead of focusing on technique or pace I found myself ruminating over aspects of the suits,how many more swims did the suit have,is it the right size,was the reason I didn't get better results from my B-70 because it was too big?etc.The B-70 has somewhat mitigated the "too expensive,not durable" problem,but for how long.
Lets say a company comes up with a suit that is much faster,say 4 sec/100.Further that it is very expensive(say $1000) lasts 4 swims and is very hard to make so that quantities are always limited and the fastest way to get one is to bid up to $3000 on ebay. Now lets say your nemesis has one,or that getting one is your best chance to get TT or AA or a ZR or WR,or that your child is close to making JO cuts,or finally beating his/her nemesis etc. Is it worth it and where does it stop?
The wooden Louisville slugger is traditional.
The aluminum Easton pinger is a technological improvement, at least for batters and bat purchasers--the ball goes farther, and the bats are almost impossible to break. Pitchers may not like them because a hard drive off an aluminum bat screaming to the head is more likely to result in premature death.
Essay question Part B:
Is it possible to be FOR wooden baseball bats and also FOR technical swimming suits and not be in some sense hypocritical?
Open your second blue book.
Begin.
Bias revealed: I am for wooden bats and technical swim suits because A) I don't play baseball myself but like to think today's game still has something in common with Abner Doubleday's vision, and B) I do swim and want every possible advantage I can get, and C) I am a hypocrite.
The wooden Louisville slugger is traditional.
The aluminum Easton pinger is a technological improvement, at least for batters and bat purchasers--the ball goes farther, and the bats are almost impossible to break. Pitchers may not like them because a hard drive off an aluminum bat screaming to the head is more likely to result in premature death.
Essay question Part B:
Is it possible to be FOR wooden baseball bats and also FOR technical swimming suits and not be in some sense hypocritical?
Open your second blue book.
Begin.
Bias revealed: I am for wooden bats and technical swim suits because A) I don't play baseball myself but like to think today's game still has something in common with Abner Doubleday's vision, and B) I do swim and want every possible advantage I can get, and C) I am a hypocrite.
