Should the debate be who is the better athlete or should the debate be whose athletic accomplishment is more worthy of recognition? Bolt could be the better "athlete" but isn't Phelp's accomplishment perhaps more worthy of recogntion?
I suppose all of this can get rather tricky because how does one decide which athletic feat is more worthy of recognition?
Should the debate be who is the better athlete or should the debate be whose athletic accomplishment is more worthy of recognition? Bolt could be the better "athlete" but isn't Phelp's accomplishment perhaps more worthy of recogntion?
I suppose all of this can get rather tricky because how does one decide which athletic feat is more worthy of recognition?
