I don't know how he did it....

Former Member
Former Member
.01 and took an extra stroke!
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I've been watching the underwater replays. It looks simultaneous. It's impossible to distinguish with the naked eye. And that's why electronic timing is actually measured to the 1/1000th although results are displayed and recorded in the (e-?)books only to the 1/100th. Therefore, electronically (faulty pads or not) Phelps won by a whopping 10/1000th of a second.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I've been watching the underwater replays. It looks simultaneous. It's impossible to distinguish with the naked eye. And that's why electronic timing is actually measured to the 1/1000th although results are displayed and recorded in the (e-?)books only to the 1/100th. Therefore, electronically (faulty pads or not) Phelps won by a whopping 10/1000th of a second.
Children
No Data