I've certainly heard of it and heard the then-IG of the Department of Defense (Derek Vander Schaaf) talk about it in the early 90s when he visited my university's ROTC program. Procedures at one lab were so sloppy that none of the results should have been trusted. And the military proceeded to throw out pilots trained at millions of dollars of taxpayer expense. Only much later did they say "gee, we made a mistake!"
Why would it still be a 2-year suspension if the test was tainted?
Obviously only a few people around here have ever heard about tainted testing....breaking the chain of custody....those little annoying things that can happen with the amount of testing going on.....would it put her back on the team.....NO......if that is the case it would still be a 2 year suspension. But again......I will wait for the final appeal decision.......
If it turns out it was voluntary......my opinion.....banned for life from competing.........No tolerance is the only way the message will get through to people....
I've certainly heard of it and heard the then-IG of the Department of Defense (Derek Vander Schaaf) talk about it in the early 90s when he visited my university's ROTC program. Procedures at one lab were so sloppy that none of the results should have been trusted. And the military proceeded to throw out pilots trained at millions of dollars of taxpayer expense. Only much later did they say "gee, we made a mistake!"
Why would it still be a 2-year suspension if the test was tainted?
Obviously only a few people around here have ever heard about tainted testing....breaking the chain of custody....those little annoying things that can happen with the amount of testing going on.....would it put her back on the team.....NO......if that is the case it would still be a 2 year suspension. But again......I will wait for the final appeal decision.......
If it turns out it was voluntary......my opinion.....banned for life from competing.........No tolerance is the only way the message will get through to people....
