Phelps is definately a cut above most elite swimmers with his amazing mastery of basically all four strokes (breastroke withholding, barely) - but I do not consider his swimming ability unmatched.
One can ask the question that if Mark Spitz was 23 today, with the same access to modern swim techniques, methods, gear (I mean, a cap and goggles probably would give him an extra second at least with that crazy hair-doo and stache!!). As I recall, Spitz actually acheived faster times in his early 40's than when he was at the Olympics.
Mark Spitz never, ever, achieved faster times in his early 40's than when he swam at the 1972 Olympics. When Spitz tried to make a comeback he managed to go :58.03 in the 100 meter Fly and that is almost 4 seconds from the :54.27 he swam at the 1972 Olympics. The 1992 Olympic Trial qualifying time was :55.59 and he wasn't even close to that either in his failed bid to make the 1992 Olympic Trials standard in that event. It took Spitz 2 full years to do a time that came up almost 2.5 seconds from qualifying
Another standard of comparison is the 50 Meter Fly. Spitz split :25.38 on his way to the :54.27 in the 1972 Olympics. In April of 1991, as part of
his Olympic comeback, he was involved in some TV prize races sponsored by Clairol against Tom Jager and Matt Biondi where he was soundly beaten in the 50 Meter Fly.
The first race took place on April 13, 1991 and in front of a national TV audience and he lost to Tom Jager by 1.78 seconds (:24.91 vs :26.70). Two weeks later on April 27, 1991 he lost a second prize race in front of a national TV audience to Matt Biondi by 2.10 seconds (:24.51 vs :26.51). In that second race Matt Biondi got off to a slow start and missed the World Best Time of :24.39 because in 1991 they still hadn't recognized 50 stroke races as World Records.
What I remember about the TV telecast is that it was pointed out that the :26.51 would have placed a distant 34th at the recent Senior Nationals in Federal Way of swimmers split times in the 100 Meter Fly. Also it was pointed out that 3 swimmers from the Junior Nationals had faster split times at the 50 in their 100 Meter Fly. The 26.51 was 1.13 seconds from what the split was in 1972.
There was a lot of incentive for him to do this because Bud Greenspan was going to make a film of his comeback if he were successful. The fact that his :54.27 time in 1972 would have placed him 3rd in the 1989 USA LCM rankings made people believe he could do it.
Phelps is definately a cut above most elite swimmers with his amazing mastery of basically all four strokes (breastroke withholding, barely) - but I do not consider his swimming ability unmatched.
One can ask the question that if Mark Spitz was 23 today, with the same access to modern swim techniques, methods, gear (I mean, a cap and goggles probably would give him an extra second at least with that crazy hair-doo and stache!!). As I recall, Spitz actually acheived faster times in his early 40's than when he was at the Olympics.
Mark Spitz never, ever, achieved faster times in his early 40's than when he swam at the 1972 Olympics. When Spitz tried to make a comeback he managed to go :58.03 in the 100 meter Fly and that is almost 4 seconds from the :54.27 he swam at the 1972 Olympics. The 1992 Olympic Trial qualifying time was :55.59 and he wasn't even close to that either in his failed bid to make the 1992 Olympic Trials standard in that event. It took Spitz 2 full years to do a time that came up almost 2.5 seconds from qualifying
Another standard of comparison is the 50 Meter Fly. Spitz split :25.38 on his way to the :54.27 in the 1972 Olympics. In April of 1991, as part of
his Olympic comeback, he was involved in some TV prize races sponsored by Clairol against Tom Jager and Matt Biondi where he was soundly beaten in the 50 Meter Fly.
The first race took place on April 13, 1991 and in front of a national TV audience and he lost to Tom Jager by 1.78 seconds (:24.91 vs :26.70). Two weeks later on April 27, 1991 he lost a second prize race in front of a national TV audience to Matt Biondi by 2.10 seconds (:24.51 vs :26.51). In that second race Matt Biondi got off to a slow start and missed the World Best Time of :24.39 because in 1991 they still hadn't recognized 50 stroke races as World Records.
What I remember about the TV telecast is that it was pointed out that the :26.51 would have placed a distant 34th at the recent Senior Nationals in Federal Way of swimmers split times in the 100 Meter Fly. Also it was pointed out that 3 swimmers from the Junior Nationals had faster split times at the 50 in their 100 Meter Fly. The 26.51 was 1.13 seconds from what the split was in 1972.
There was a lot of incentive for him to do this because Bud Greenspan was going to make a film of his comeback if he were successful. The fact that his :54.27 time in 1972 would have placed him 3rd in the 1989 USA LCM rankings made people believe he could do it.
