From the New York Times:
www.nytimes.com/.../18swimmer.html
A Disabled Swimmer’s Dream, a Mother’s Fight
By ALAN SCHWARZ
Published: June 18, 2008
SAN DIEGO — As Kendall Bailey swims, his praying-mantis limbs flapping him forward, something about the water disguises his many maladies: cerebral palsy, mental retardation, autism and more. Only in a swimming pool do they dissolve and allow his troubled body and mind to be all but normal. He is happy, safe and possibly the fastest disabled breaststroker in the world....
Parents
Former Member
Refresh my memory, what were the previous rounds where you got anyone?
Let's keep it real also. Two of your expert opinions are LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. C'mon man, seriously, do you really think we are that dumb?
You have never answered if you are even a USMS member. I don't see you on the member directory.
hey Aquageek
Although two of these publications (waste to energy and the effect of wind turbines) are letters to the editor, they were screened as to fact worthiness the editors did contact me about I obtained the support for my propositions and their general technical merit. There's nothing "dumb" about the readers on this board accepting that.
And the positions that I have taken on these issues are in fact the most acceptable and practical analysis. Do you personally have anything to contradict my reasoning? :dunno:
By the way Mr. Aquageek, since you seem to be so intent on personally putting me down with your sacastic & mudslinging comments, could you kindly state YOUR qualifications to speak on the technical subjects that I have discussed in these three publications? :dunno:
Dolphin 2
Refresh my memory, what were the previous rounds where you got anyone?
Let's keep it real also. Two of your expert opinions are LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. C'mon man, seriously, do you really think we are that dumb?
You have never answered if you are even a USMS member. I don't see you on the member directory.
hey Aquageek
Although two of these publications (waste to energy and the effect of wind turbines) are letters to the editor, they were screened as to fact worthiness the editors did contact me about I obtained the support for my propositions and their general technical merit. There's nothing "dumb" about the readers on this board accepting that.
And the positions that I have taken on these issues are in fact the most acceptable and practical analysis. Do you personally have anything to contradict my reasoning? :dunno:
By the way Mr. Aquageek, since you seem to be so intent on personally putting me down with your sacastic & mudslinging comments, could you kindly state YOUR qualifications to speak on the technical subjects that I have discussed in these three publications? :dunno:
Dolphin 2
