some very fast swimmers are going to swim in this meet as well as a few masters
Here's where you'll find Real Time Results
www.realtime.net/.../index.htm
attached is the preliminary psyche sheet
www.texasseniorcircuitswimming.org/2008meetschedule.htm
aggie site
www.aggieathletics.com/index2.php
O r d e r . . . o f . . . E v e n t s
Women's Events Men's Events
Friday, May 16
Prelims: 7am warm-up; 9am meet start Finals: 4:30pm warm-up; 6pm meet start
1 50m fly 2
3 200m back 4
5 100m free 6
7 200m *** 8
9 *400m free 10
11 400m free relay 12
Saturday, May 17
Prelims: 7am warm-up; 9am meet start Finals: 4:30pm warm-up; 6pm meet start
13 100m fly 14
15 100m *** 16
17 200m free 18
19 50m back 20
21 *400m IM 22
23 400m medley relay 24
Sunday, May 18
Prelims: 7am warm-up; 9am meet start Finals: 3:30pm warm-up; 5pm meet start
25 50m *** 26
27 200m fly 28
29 100m back 30
31 **800m free --
32 200m IM 33
-- 1500m free 34
35 50m free 36
I hope there is no backlash against laser-toting masters crossover swimmers - the pool length issue would probably never have surfaced but for David's laser measure. Then again, 49.97 is pretty unambiguous. It is what it is, and it ain't 50 meters.
I have always been amazed that USA swimming has not been as strict on the whole pool measurement thing. It seems that would be a standard item on any big meet's check-off list. And I think that anytime a bulkhead is used, that the initial measurement before a session is more critical than measuring the 2 outside lanes and a middle lane at the end of a session.
Does anyone know - who actually footed the bill when the Stanford pool came up short before Masters Worlds?
I hope there is no backlash against laser-toting masters crossover swimmers - the pool length issue would probably never have surfaced but for David's laser measure. Then again, 49.97 is pretty unambiguous. It is what it is, and it ain't 50 meters.
I have always been amazed that USA swimming has not been as strict on the whole pool measurement thing. It seems that would be a standard item on any big meet's check-off list. And I think that anytime a bulkhead is used, that the initial measurement before a session is more critical than measuring the 2 outside lanes and a middle lane at the end of a session.
Does anyone know - who actually footed the bill when the Stanford pool came up short before Masters Worlds?
