I was swimming at a meet today, and I noticed that most/many swimmers get out of the pool (or at least in my heats when I was noticing it) more or less right after they're done with their race.
Back when I was about 9 (1993ish), I remember my coach told us before the local summer swim league championship meet (it was my first) at UNC's Koury Natatorium using electronic timing, etc., that it was good sportsmanship to wait until the entire heat is finished with their swim, and then get out of the pool. The reasoning was never explained to me at the time, but I can infer a good reason: no one has to finish the race alone (there are probably other good reasons).
I've generally adopted this practice for the most part when I swim in meets, even though this can impact the operation of the meet (namely, if it takes longer to exit the pool, the meet takes longer, unless you use dive-overs). And this practice can be problematic if you win the heat, and it takes a long period of time for the heat to finish (say 5 minutes). I should also note that I haven't paid a great amount of attention to this, and that the heats that I generally swim in are early heats, which tend to have larger time spreads (which would skew my perception). Furthermore many people who didn't have the lengthy experience with competitive swimming that someone like I would might not know about this idea. And in the grand scheme of things, waiting doesn't make you a better person or a worse person than anyone else--it's just a custom.
So what does everyone think about this kind of thing? Is it something that matters or is it largely irrelevant? And is the practice of waiting commonplace or haphazard?
Patrick King
Parents
Former Member
I've done 400IM in local USMS meets where the range of times is pretty long in a single heat
I'm sure that is true Steve. You swam about a 4:10 IM at Div. III Nationals back when I pretended to coach you. I'll bet you'd wait almost two minutes for me to finish if I was in your heat.
I agree with the posters who think it's good manners to wait for the rest of your heat to finish, but sometimes it's just better to get out. A few years ago I was 17th seed out of 17 for the 50-54 200 Fly at Indy. There were two heats of eight for the age group, and I was thrown in with the first heat where there were a couple of open lanes. The next youngest guy was 78 I think. I didn't swim great, but I actually exited the water, ran down to the north course, watched my friend finish his race, and then returned to the south end of the natatorium to realize that two of the guys in my heat were approaching their last turn. They kept it legal, and the roar of the crowd was genuine praise for what the two 80 something swimmers endured to finish their event. I'm glad I had such a good view of it from the pool deck.
Ken
Taking a year off with four broken ribs. :(
I've done 400IM in local USMS meets where the range of times is pretty long in a single heat
I'm sure that is true Steve. You swam about a 4:10 IM at Div. III Nationals back when I pretended to coach you. I'll bet you'd wait almost two minutes for me to finish if I was in your heat.
I agree with the posters who think it's good manners to wait for the rest of your heat to finish, but sometimes it's just better to get out. A few years ago I was 17th seed out of 17 for the 50-54 200 Fly at Indy. There were two heats of eight for the age group, and I was thrown in with the first heat where there were a couple of open lanes. The next youngest guy was 78 I think. I didn't swim great, but I actually exited the water, ran down to the north course, watched my friend finish his race, and then returned to the south end of the natatorium to realize that two of the guys in my heat were approaching their last turn. They kept it legal, and the roar of the crowd was genuine praise for what the two 80 something swimmers endured to finish their event. I'm glad I had such a good view of it from the pool deck.
Ken
Taking a year off with four broken ribs. :(