After seeing a woman break 24 seconds and I think we can stop the discussion of "IF" the LZR suit is faster and start thinking "how much faster".
The previous line of suits (Fastskin and so on) were pretty similiar to a shaved swimmer. Sure - they do feel like they make you float, but overall the times seemed to move along "in line" with what I would expect to see in terms of improvements in the sport. If the previous suits would have been that much faster than shaving, you would have never seen people just using the legskins. By the way - for us Masters swimmers there was always the added benefit of keeping in all the "extra layers of skin".
So how much faster are the LZR suits ?
If I had to guess based on the results so far, I would say 0.25 to 0.30 per 50 and double that for the 100. I can see the Bernard going 48 low in the 100 and I can see Sullivan getting close or just breaking the 50 record. It makes sense that Libby Lenton would swim a 24.2 or so in the 50.
I think one of the top regular teams out there should do a test - you need a good amount of world class swimmers training together to be able to do a test. Here is the test I would propose:
8-10 swimmers
2 days of testing
4x50 on 10 minutes all out
Day 1 - swim 2 with a Fastskin2 followed by 2 with the LZR
Day 2 - swim 2 with the LZR followed by 2 with the Fastskin2
Get the averages of all 10 swimmers - maybe drop the high and low and there you go.
Why do the test ? I would HAVE to know. Swimming is a big part of your life and you just set a massive PR using this new technology - my very first question would be " How much was me and how much was the suit?"?
Parents
Former Member
Thanks guys - I am overall very happy with the swims.
I just missed the 50 and 200 records - 24.24 and 1:55.70.
I think I needed a little more rest + I was missing 2 weeks of speed work. I was planning on swimming at Nationals and then had to fast forward 2 weeks when I realized that I could not make it to Nationals.
My 50 time was the same as at the Janet Evans meet on 3 days rest. It took me a while to get out of my taper funk (see my "I hate the Taper" rant) and my top speed was good, but I think I can go faster.
The long stuff will have to wait for another year - looking now to get as close to 50.0 as possible for scm - as a 40th b-day present. My PR is 50.2 ...
Thanks guys - I am overall very happy with the swims.
I just missed the 50 and 200 records - 24.24 and 1:55.70.
I think I needed a little more rest + I was missing 2 weeks of speed work. I was planning on swimming at Nationals and then had to fast forward 2 weeks when I realized that I could not make it to Nationals.
My 50 time was the same as at the Janet Evans meet on 3 days rest. It took me a while to get out of my taper funk (see my "I hate the Taper" rant) and my top speed was good, but I think I can go faster.
The long stuff will have to wait for another year - looking now to get as close to 50.0 as possible for scm - as a 40th b-day present. My PR is 50.2 ...