LZR - It's Faster, but by how much ?

Former Member
Former Member
After seeing a woman break 24 seconds and I think we can stop the discussion of "IF" the LZR suit is faster and start thinking "how much faster". The previous line of suits (Fastskin and so on) were pretty similiar to a shaved swimmer. Sure - they do feel like they make you float, but overall the times seemed to move along "in line" with what I would expect to see in terms of improvements in the sport. If the previous suits would have been that much faster than shaving, you would have never seen people just using the legskins. By the way - for us Masters swimmers there was always the added benefit of keeping in all the "extra layers of skin". So how much faster are the LZR suits ? If I had to guess based on the results so far, I would say 0.25 to 0.30 per 50 and double that for the 100. I can see the Bernard going 48 low in the 100 and I can see Sullivan getting close or just breaking the 50 record. It makes sense that Libby Lenton would swim a 24.2 or so in the 50. I think one of the top regular teams out there should do a test - you need a good amount of world class swimmers training together to be able to do a test. Here is the test I would propose: 8-10 swimmers 2 days of testing 4x50 on 10 minutes all out Day 1 - swim 2 with a Fastskin2 followed by 2 with the LZR Day 2 - swim 2 with the LZR followed by 2 with the Fastskin2 Get the averages of all 10 swimmers - maybe drop the high and low and there you go. Why do the test ? I would HAVE to know. Swimming is a big part of your life and you just set a massive PR using this new technology - my very first question would be " How much was me and how much was the suit?"?
Parents
  • golf and swimming are way different the right tech suit could make way more difference than the right club a properly fitting tech suit makes your body more aqua dynamic I know I'm way faster wearing a Blue Seventy Nero Comp than my training suit. Ande, Sorry, no they are not. In the last 2 years, since I changed out my 3 and 5 woods for new technology (and the equipment change I have made) , I have taken 4.7 points off my handicap index. From a 18.9 to a 14.2 which would equate to a 24.9% reduction. Now assuming that the equipment was responsible for half that difference, that is still a 12.45% reduction which sure beats a supposed 2-3% reduction from the new suits. And yes, I know the new clubs have made a difference because, I track my stats when I play Avg Distance Old - Taylor Made Burner2 3W - 237.4 yds New - Calloway X-Hot 3W - 256.9 yds Avg accuracy (in yards measured from middle of fairway) Old - 37.6 yds New - 22.6 yds Fairways hit (in percentage) Old - 48.5% New - 71.6% Sorry, I'm a numbers geek who has a GPS :-)
Reply
  • golf and swimming are way different the right tech suit could make way more difference than the right club a properly fitting tech suit makes your body more aqua dynamic I know I'm way faster wearing a Blue Seventy Nero Comp than my training suit. Ande, Sorry, no they are not. In the last 2 years, since I changed out my 3 and 5 woods for new technology (and the equipment change I have made) , I have taken 4.7 points off my handicap index. From a 18.9 to a 14.2 which would equate to a 24.9% reduction. Now assuming that the equipment was responsible for half that difference, that is still a 12.45% reduction which sure beats a supposed 2-3% reduction from the new suits. And yes, I know the new clubs have made a difference because, I track my stats when I play Avg Distance Old - Taylor Made Burner2 3W - 237.4 yds New - Calloway X-Hot 3W - 256.9 yds Avg accuracy (in yards measured from middle of fairway) Old - 37.6 yds New - 22.6 yds Fairways hit (in percentage) Old - 48.5% New - 71.6% Sorry, I'm a numbers geek who has a GPS :-)
Children
No Data