The Demise of Mens Swimming in the US

Former Member
Former Member
Below are the number of entrants for each event at the Junior Nationals for 2008. What do these figures mean for men's swimming long term? The number of boys in the sport trails girls quite siginficantly in many events. In relays where a team tends to show its depth, boys are out numbered by girls nearly 2:1 If things continue or get worse we've got problems ahead of us in 2 Olympics. It's a good thing collegiate budgets aren't cutting mens swimming these days.... :-) ncsassociation.homestead.com/PsychFINAL.htm .............Women Men 1650/1000... 78.. 75 Med. Relay... 97.. 51 100 free... 264.. 140 100 ***... 179.. 102 200 back... 173.. 111 200 fly... 149.. 91 800 fr rly... 81.. 43 50 fly... 170.. 106 50 ***... 151.. 82 200 free... 252.. 159 400 IM... 183.. 106 400 free rly... 84.. 45 100 back... 194.. 152 500 free... 188.. 112 200 ***... 152.. 82 100 fly... 242.. 161 200 fr rly... 84.. 45 50 back... 135.. 115 200 IM... 268.. 169 50 free... 282.. 153 800/1500 fr... 98.. 67 400 med rly... 105.. 54
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    2. Another reason I see in my region for the decrease in swimming is the reluctance to build indoor facilities. It used to be that when you built a high school, you included a pool in the construction cost. Now, the school districts have to take into account litigation when building a pool, and expensive tax based bond issues. You can have as many gyms, fieldhouses, fields as you want, but when you build a pool, the scare is there that someone could die from drowning. It's not worth the cost. There are several municipal rec centers around, but as most of you know, the time at these facilities is monopolized by the community programs. This is happening where I live, too. I just noticed another trend here - the "YMCA Express". We're about to get two of them. They're advertised as "just like a YMCA, but without the pool." Anna Lea
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    2. Another reason I see in my region for the decrease in swimming is the reluctance to build indoor facilities. It used to be that when you built a high school, you included a pool in the construction cost. Now, the school districts have to take into account litigation when building a pool, and expensive tax based bond issues. You can have as many gyms, fieldhouses, fields as you want, but when you build a pool, the scare is there that someone could die from drowning. It's not worth the cost. There are several municipal rec centers around, but as most of you know, the time at these facilities is monopolized by the community programs. This is happening where I live, too. I just noticed another trend here - the "YMCA Express". We're about to get two of them. They're advertised as "just like a YMCA, but without the pool." Anna Lea
Children
No Data