I had a swimming experience that makes me rethink my approach to the 200 BR.2006 I swam a 2:48.34 200 SCM BR in a very well paced swim and was happy with it(it was the AA time.) At the SPMA meet I went out way too slow and swam a 2:52.40 and was not happy with it.Jim Clemmons went 2:46.33 at that meet.The next week I had the opportunity to swim another 200 BR and was determined to"redeem" myself.I didn't think I could match Jim's time,but I knew I could do better than the prior meet.My plan was to go out somewhere between fast and too fast because there was no way I was taking it out too slow again.My splits were
37.14,41.49,42.56,45.17 for a 2:46.36.OK Jim beat me by .03 sec(in the probable AA time) and it hurt like hell the last 50,but that was my fastest time in about 5 years. I can't explain it.Ideas?
Parents
Former Member
Here is how I split a 200 (scy) last year:
29.74 1:01.06 (31.32)
1:32.45 (31.39) 2:02.94 (30.49)
which is only a .82 difference between the first and second 100.
Here is how I split a 200 (scy) last year:
29.74 1:01.06 (31.32)
1:32.45 (31.39) 2:02.94 (30.49)
which is only a .82 difference between the first and second 100.
