I had a swimming experience that makes me rethink my approach to the 200 BR.2006 I swam a 2:48.34 200 SCM BR in a very well paced swim and was happy with it(it was the AA time.) At the SPMA meet I went out way too slow and swam a 2:52.40 and was not happy with it.Jim Clemmons went 2:46.33 at that meet.The next week I had the opportunity to swim another 200 BR and was determined to"redeem" myself.I didn't think I could match Jim's time,but I knew I could do better than the prior meet.My plan was to go out somewhere between fast and too fast because there was no way I was taking it out too slow again.My splits were
37.14,41.49,42.56,45.17 for a 2:46.36.OK Jim beat me by .03 sec(in the probable AA time) and it hurt like hell the last 50,but that was my fastest time in about 5 years. I can't explain it.Ideas?
If anyone in my age group (50-54 as of 2/9) is reading this and planning to swim the 200, 500, or 1000 at Nationals in May, I encourage you to take it out very fast.
So you mean splitting it like this (yeah I know this is LCM but you get the point):
Montgomery, Jim 51 DAMM-USA 2:08.12
29.22 1:01.85 (32.63)
1:35.22 (33.37) 2:08.12 (32.90)
If anyone in my age group (50-54 as of 2/9) is reading this and planning to swim the 200, 500, or 1000 at Nationals in May, I encourage you to take it out very fast.
So you mean splitting it like this (yeah I know this is LCM but you get the point):
Montgomery, Jim 51 DAMM-USA 2:08.12
29.22 1:01.85 (32.63)
1:35.22 (33.37) 2:08.12 (32.90)
