Pacing,we don't need no stinking pacing

I had a swimming experience that makes me rethink my approach to the 200 BR.2006 I swam a 2:48.34 200 SCM BR in a very well paced swim and was happy with it(it was the AA time.) At the SPMA meet I went out way too slow and swam a 2:52.40 and was not happy with it.Jim Clemmons went 2:46.33 at that meet.The next week I had the opportunity to swim another 200 BR and was determined to"redeem" myself.I didn't think I could match Jim's time,but I knew I could do better than the prior meet.My plan was to go out somewhere between fast and too fast because there was no way I was taking it out too slow again.My splits were 37.14,41.49,42.56,45.17 for a 2:46.36.OK Jim beat me by .03 sec(in the probable AA time) and it hurt like hell the last 50,but that was my fastest time in about 5 years. I can't explain it.Ideas?
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    If I remember my education from the old college days, 100% energy expenditure lasts about six seconds. Then you slow down. All sprints are paced, the 100 meter dash, or the 50 free. The 200 is just a bit more vomit inducing. Sorry to bring up vomit again.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    If I remember my education from the old college days, 100% energy expenditure lasts about six seconds. Then you slow down. All sprints are paced, the 100 meter dash, or the 50 free. The 200 is just a bit more vomit inducing. Sorry to bring up vomit again.
Children
No Data