Muscle Milk - Are the claims true?

Former Member
Former Member
Check out this link: www.bodybuilding.com/.../milk.html Firstly, are the claims for real? Anyone out there taking it who can back up anything that the makers claim it does? Secondly, is it legal? It seems to be on a par with Creatine which, as far as I can ascertain from other threads on this forum, is not banned. Finally, are there any hazards to taking something like this? sincerely Syd
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    If it's proven to be safe and non habitforming then it should be legitimised as a supplement. The issue with steroids is because kids think it's ok and do it..the detrimental risks are too high... I think whether something is ethical has something to do with relationship among how much it effects performance, how much it costs, and how dangerous it is. For example, full body racing suits probably make you a little faster, they cost a lot, and they are not dangerous. This may mean they are unethical, because some swimmers can't afford them. But most of us use them. Creatine may make you a little faster, the amount needed for meet preparation costs a few bucks, and it's not dangerous. By comparison, that sounds pretty ethical to me.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    If it's proven to be safe and non habitforming then it should be legitimised as a supplement. The issue with steroids is because kids think it's ok and do it..the detrimental risks are too high... I think whether something is ethical has something to do with relationship among how much it effects performance, how much it costs, and how dangerous it is. For example, full body racing suits probably make you a little faster, they cost a lot, and they are not dangerous. This may mean they are unethical, because some swimmers can't afford them. But most of us use them. Creatine may make you a little faster, the amount needed for meet preparation costs a few bucks, and it's not dangerous. By comparison, that sounds pretty ethical to me.
Children
No Data