In swimming, how is it that one can excel in both sprints and long distance? Is it because the distance games in swimming are only "relatively" distance games but are not really distance games from a physiologic perspective?
In the world of tracks, for example, an athlete cannot excel at both sprints and distance. Even the athletes from the two areas look different - much leaner for the distance runners and muscular for the sprinters.
I am wondering about this because whether I should focus on either the sprint or the distance as I plan to participate in the masters meet, or whether I don't have to sacrifice one for the other.
my 100s are usually 2-2.5 seconds apart.
See, you're really a middle distance swimmer and you're just deluding yourself into thinking you're actually a sprinter!
Same with Paul Smith. His even or negative split 200s show he's really a D man who's just too darn lazy to actually swim any distance events!! :thhbbb:
my 100s are usually 2-2.5 seconds apart.
See, you're really a middle distance swimmer and you're just deluding yourself into thinking you're actually a sprinter!
Same with Paul Smith. His even or negative split 200s show he's really a D man who's just too darn lazy to actually swim any distance events!! :thhbbb:
