The FINA rules say no but not considering the rulebook, should Libby Lenton's 52.99 go in the record books. There has been alot of debate on this in the other thread. What do you think?
Barry Bonds situation is different from Lance's. Lance was tested many times. MLB pretended it didn't have a problem and it's "testing" was a Joke. By Olympic or Biking rules Bonds would have tested positive for the"cream" and the"clear."MLB's head in the sand mentality brought this on themselves.
If a swimmer swam a time trial 100 and a swimmer in the next lane swam a 70 as fast as possible to provide a draft and then slowed down but finished and the first swimmer broke the WR,wouldn't FINA count it?
Barry Bonds situation is different from Lance's. Lance was tested many times. MLB pretended it didn't have a problem and it's "testing" was a Joke. By Olympic or Biking rules Bonds would have tested positive for the"cream" and the"clear."MLB's head in the sand mentality brought this on themselves.
If a swimmer swam a time trial 100 and a swimmer in the next lane swam a 70 as fast as possible to provide a draft and then slowed down but finished and the first swimmer broke the WR,wouldn't FINA count it?
