And the jerk-of-the-year award goes to ...

Former Member
Former Member
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I can understand the coach being unhappy if the guy was on an athletic scholarship. Stanford costs $47,000 a year and there are all sorts of swimmers who are willing to give 100% in return for their education. I do believe this one was a walk-on. I can understand if the swimmer took 3+ months out of the pool and returned 10# overweight and too out of shape to keep up with the rest of the team in workouts in September. There is no off season for D1 athletes in a top-ranked program. They are in a program requiring commitment and excellence, not just fitness and participation. But expunging his records is either very wrong or very sloppy.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    I can understand the coach being unhappy if the guy was on an athletic scholarship. Stanford costs $47,000 a year and there are all sorts of swimmers who are willing to give 100% in return for their education. I do believe this one was a walk-on. I can understand if the swimmer took 3+ months out of the pool and returned 10# overweight and too out of shape to keep up with the rest of the team in workouts in September. There is no off season for D1 athletes in a top-ranked program. They are in a program requiring commitment and excellence, not just fitness and participation. But expunging his records is either very wrong or very sloppy.
Children
No Data