Geek vs. Gull II, or why I now idolize the Geek and have embraced TI

Former Member
Former Member
The Geek and I swam head to head this weekend, matching up in the 200 and 500 (in adjacent lanes for both, believe it or not). The Geek won both, beating me by about a second in the 200 and I believe 3 or 4 seconds in the 500. He'd shed 20 pounds since we last raced and shaved (as I did), but he was not wearing a Fastskin. I did swim a personal (Masters) best in the 500, nearly 5 seconds faster than last year, and split it extremely well, but alas it wasn't enough. As the winner, he walked off with a Starbucks gift card and of course this thread. See you in Austin in 2008, Geek.
Parents
  • It's healthy rivalries of this sort that can move us to examine more aspects of how we swim and how our practice relates to our racing goals. Amen brother! When I first started swimming, this guy, lets call him EddieTheEaglesFan, was swimming with us, and he was a pretty good swimmer and kind of taunted me about me being 18/19/20 and slower than he. It got me motivated pretty good, and I was gunning for him in the 200 free. When I finally beat him, I destroyed him, and though he was peeved, he was very gracious in admitting I worked hard for it and deserved it. Next target: Ellis, sprinter by nature, becoming distance swimmer by age (~12 years my senior). We started gunning for some ambitious 500 times in '04. Whatever time he went, I was 3-5 sec behind; to make matters more exciting, the next meet we swam, I'd finish with his times from the previous meet and he would just continue the 3-5 second domination. Nationals, he busted out a 5:03, I went a 5:12, which is right about his zone time. '05 was an interesting year. We were both gunning for sub 5-min. Pretty much every meet, I would take the lead through the 400, only to be overtaken at the end EVERY TIME (the sprinter in him taking over). I became known as Ellis' Bizzatch (less friendly term), and his overtaking became known as "EB'ing." At '05 nationals, he swam about 20 minutes before I did, lowered his '04 time to a 5:01.93. I of course wanted to beat Ellis, but also wanted to get that 4:59.99. Gunned it and swam like a bat out of hell. Finished 5:01.... 81! YAY!! We're still gunning for that 4:59.99, pushing each other to the edge to try to get it. :dedhorse:
Reply
  • It's healthy rivalries of this sort that can move us to examine more aspects of how we swim and how our practice relates to our racing goals. Amen brother! When I first started swimming, this guy, lets call him EddieTheEaglesFan, was swimming with us, and he was a pretty good swimmer and kind of taunted me about me being 18/19/20 and slower than he. It got me motivated pretty good, and I was gunning for him in the 200 free. When I finally beat him, I destroyed him, and though he was peeved, he was very gracious in admitting I worked hard for it and deserved it. Next target: Ellis, sprinter by nature, becoming distance swimmer by age (~12 years my senior). We started gunning for some ambitious 500 times in '04. Whatever time he went, I was 3-5 sec behind; to make matters more exciting, the next meet we swam, I'd finish with his times from the previous meet and he would just continue the 3-5 second domination. Nationals, he busted out a 5:03, I went a 5:12, which is right about his zone time. '05 was an interesting year. We were both gunning for sub 5-min. Pretty much every meet, I would take the lead through the 400, only to be overtaken at the end EVERY TIME (the sprinter in him taking over). I became known as Ellis' Bizzatch (less friendly term), and his overtaking became known as "EB'ing." At '05 nationals, he swam about 20 minutes before I did, lowered his '04 time to a 5:01.93. I of course wanted to beat Ellis, but also wanted to get that 4:59.99. Gunned it and swam like a bat out of hell. Finished 5:01.... 81! YAY!! We're still gunning for that 4:59.99, pushing each other to the edge to try to get it. :dedhorse:
Children
No Data