Swimming Theories

Former Member
Former Member
I am interested in knowing what swimming theory you use and why you use it. I hear much about Total Immersion and not just from this forum. I hear much about swimming high on the water slightly looking forward, and I hear much about people developing their own swimming theory best suited for them but using guidelines that help them maintain a technical stroke. Given all these different theories, it is no wonder that swimmers new to the sport are confused as to whom to listen to. I borrowed the TI book from a friend a year or so ago, and found several things I agreed with, but more that I didn’t. I am not close-minded, I just cannot find a reason to swim so low in the water with the head looking down. The rolling of the shoulders really concerned me and the fact that so much of the body is low-parallel to the water, this has to increase drag, especially on the shoulders. One thing I will say is most people who swim using TI have beautiful strokes. But, and there is a but, they just don’t swim fast. Maybe I have just been so isolated here on this island that I have not heard of any, but are there any Olympians using TI? Or, will the young-uns using it be our next generation? There is a USMS club in Fort Worth who advocated TI. Sadly, now they are deconstructing all those methods because no matter what the workout and intensity, their swimmers’ speeds could never develop. I get to speak to many triathlete swimmers here every March. The Elite (professional) swimmers swim high on top of the water looking forward and they use hip rotation, not shoulder rolling. Many of the age-groupers in this event just don’t understand why they are not swimming faster using TI. Now, we all know that most of the triathletes who were swimmers first, and runners and bikers second, always fare better in the swim portion. I have said this before and I will say it again, there is more than one way to swim. I swim higher on top of the water looking forward, about a yard or two and use hip rotation. The reason for this is picture a person throwing a rock that skims the lake. The rock is flying on top of the water and not in it, so it moves much faster until its momentum ceases. Now, I know people are not rocks, but the principle is founded. Swimming on top of the water generates power and the swimmer can truly feel it. I swim slightly “planed” outward and upward and skim over the water, not in it. Nowadays, because I am older and carry more weight, I swim not quite as high on the water and this has evolved over the last ten years or so. So even though I started out swimming “high” on the water looking forward, my stroke has become my own personal one that suits me very well. I also want to mention that I am referring to only freestyle here even though with all of my backstroke days, I, again, swam rather “planed” upward because I could get more rotation on top of the water rather than “in” the water. I am not trying to cause a brou-ha-ha. I am just curious about the swimming theories and why people select them. And after swimming with any specific theory, are you happy with it? Donna
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    This thread has been one of the most informative, challenging, and rewarding experiences since I have joined this forum. I am not only grateful for everyone's comments, I am learning much from the posts. And even though I am a "clydesdale", at least I am one because that means I am still swimming. And now that I am older and less fit, I find it important to be here because as my body is aging, I do find, from time-to-time, that swimming like I used to is differently difficult, so I do search for those new methods to adjust my technique. This is why I was asking so much about TI and the fact that this may be the new "wave" of swimming theory. I would never bash a swimmer's choice of technique; I would just disagree with it if it wasn't working for them. I guess I am also guilty of a cop-out. I choose distance because it is now easier than trying to swim a 1:12 100 meter back. Not possible anymore, nor would I want to try. But I have paid my dues and enjoyed some degree of glory along the way. But, like the saying goes: we all get knocked off our pedestals at some point because there is always someone faster. And even when we age-up, they follow us. I have respect for Terry; his passion is unparalleled. But I would prefer that he talk with me, not at me and keep his insults at a minimum. Anyone who slings insults does not have the kind of character that I would want to be associated with and this goes for anyone who does this. It reminds me of "negative management." After all that has been written, believe it or not, I still have questions about the use of TI. And please correct me if I am wrong: TI swimmers swim more low in the water, or downhill TI swimmers do not endorse swim aids TI swimmers do not utilize high-intensity training Would TI technique methods help me with my upcoming 18 mile swim? Can small adjustments be made since I only have about a year & half to the swim? I have no intention of swiming this thing fast; the objective is to complete it. I will continue to remain open-minded. Donna;)
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    This thread has been one of the most informative, challenging, and rewarding experiences since I have joined this forum. I am not only grateful for everyone's comments, I am learning much from the posts. And even though I am a "clydesdale", at least I am one because that means I am still swimming. And now that I am older and less fit, I find it important to be here because as my body is aging, I do find, from time-to-time, that swimming like I used to is differently difficult, so I do search for those new methods to adjust my technique. This is why I was asking so much about TI and the fact that this may be the new "wave" of swimming theory. I would never bash a swimmer's choice of technique; I would just disagree with it if it wasn't working for them. I guess I am also guilty of a cop-out. I choose distance because it is now easier than trying to swim a 1:12 100 meter back. Not possible anymore, nor would I want to try. But I have paid my dues and enjoyed some degree of glory along the way. But, like the saying goes: we all get knocked off our pedestals at some point because there is always someone faster. And even when we age-up, they follow us. I have respect for Terry; his passion is unparalleled. But I would prefer that he talk with me, not at me and keep his insults at a minimum. Anyone who slings insults does not have the kind of character that I would want to be associated with and this goes for anyone who does this. It reminds me of "negative management." After all that has been written, believe it or not, I still have questions about the use of TI. And please correct me if I am wrong: TI swimmers swim more low in the water, or downhill TI swimmers do not endorse swim aids TI swimmers do not utilize high-intensity training Would TI technique methods help me with my upcoming 18 mile swim? Can small adjustments be made since I only have about a year & half to the swim? I have no intention of swiming this thing fast; the objective is to complete it. I will continue to remain open-minded. Donna;)
Children
No Data