Please excuse me if this has been posted before.
It seems that in order to be a National/World class sprinter, you have to be 6ft 3 or better. It would appear that taller is better. Popov was 6' 7", Hall 6'5", Lezak 6'5', Cullen Jones 6' 5", Sabir Mahammed 6'6". our own Smith crew 6'?, An oldy but a goody Robert Peel 6'6 etc, etc. From my TV, it looked as though Phelps was the shortest guy on the WR 400 free relay at 6' 4"
Knowing this, in the future, should shorter, young, potential world class sprinters be redirected to middle distance or other strokes? Do short guys/gals even stand a chance anymore?
It would seem that basketball players would make the best sprinters. They have the height, the strength and the vertical leap down pat.
Originally posted by Racer X
Did that moose use a track start or grab start and did he swim with open or closed hooves?:)
You'd have to ask George, as the moose started in Canada. I was lifeguarding at Charlotte beach (where the Genesee River empties into the lake), and one of the animal dudes had us row him out. Moose was swimming head up the whole time, so the technique wasn't ideal.
Originally posted by Racer X
Did that moose use a track start or grab start and did he swim with open or closed hooves?:)
You'd have to ask George, as the moose started in Canada. I was lifeguarding at Charlotte beach (where the Genesee River empties into the lake), and one of the animal dudes had us row him out. Moose was swimming head up the whole time, so the technique wasn't ideal.
