Please excuse me if this has been posted before.
It seems that in order to be a National/World class sprinter, you have to be 6ft 3 or better. It would appear that taller is better. Popov was 6' 7", Hall 6'5", Lezak 6'5', Cullen Jones 6' 5", Sabir Mahammed 6'6". our own Smith crew 6'?, An oldy but a goody Robert Peel 6'6 etc, etc. From my TV, it looked as though Phelps was the shortest guy on the WR 400 free relay at 6' 4"
Knowing this, in the future, should shorter, young, potential world class sprinters be redirected to middle distance or other strokes? Do short guys/gals even stand a chance anymore?
It would seem that basketball players would make the best sprinters. They have the height, the strength and the vertical leap down pat.
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by craiglll@yahoo.com
I thought this was a no braiiner. Short swimmers only do ***. When I was in high school inthe 70s, most of our team was made up of average height., Now it is all tall guys.
Hey hey hey....watch it!!! I am tall...I do ***. Or do girls have different "rules"?
Reply
Former Member
Originally posted by craiglll@yahoo.com
I thought this was a no braiiner. Short swimmers only do ***. When I was in high school inthe 70s, most of our team was made up of average height., Now it is all tall guys.
Hey hey hey....watch it!!! I am tall...I do ***. Or do girls have different "rules"?
