www ww www
Hi
Can someone shed some light on freesstyle and backstroke compared with breaststroke when it comes to swimming for fitness and weightloss.
Thankx
Originally posted by hofffam
Breastroke swum quickly consumes more energy than freestyle or backstroke because breastroke is essentially accelerating and decelerating over and over.
However - many people choose breastroke to swim easy because it is easier to breathe. In that case I bet breastroke is less tiresome and consumes less energy.
True that... but then if the person can sustain an easy breaststroke longer than freestyle or a fast breaststroke, let's say, s/he can burn more calories than if s/he tried to swim faster than conditioning/fitness allowed.
But then I'm no expert in the calorie consumption aspect of these different strokes, since my goals usually have more to do w/ distance and improving speed and form than with calorie burning, which is more just an added bonus.
I look to running for comparison: If a person strolls on the treadmill at 20 mins/mile pace for 30 minutes, and the person at the next treadmill is running at 6 min/mile pace for the same amount of time, the six-min. miler is of course burning more calories. But if the strolling person attempted six min. pace, s/he might get frustrated and gasping for air before that pace had any chance to do its work. So the person would do better at first to either increase his/her walking time or to slightly increase the walking pace or alternate it with very light running, then gradually replace the walking with running, then running faster.
Similarly, when I first began swimming, I'd gradually incorporate faster swimming, alternating freestyle and breaststroke until I could do a mile all freestyle.
Originally posted by hofffam
Breastroke swum quickly consumes more energy than freestyle or backstroke because breastroke is essentially accelerating and decelerating over and over.
However - many people choose breastroke to swim easy because it is easier to breathe. In that case I bet breastroke is less tiresome and consumes less energy.
True that... but then if the person can sustain an easy breaststroke longer than freestyle or a fast breaststroke, let's say, s/he can burn more calories than if s/he tried to swim faster than conditioning/fitness allowed.
But then I'm no expert in the calorie consumption aspect of these different strokes, since my goals usually have more to do w/ distance and improving speed and form than with calorie burning, which is more just an added bonus.
I look to running for comparison: If a person strolls on the treadmill at 20 mins/mile pace for 30 minutes, and the person at the next treadmill is running at 6 min/mile pace for the same amount of time, the six-min. miler is of course burning more calories. But if the strolling person attempted six min. pace, s/he might get frustrated and gasping for air before that pace had any chance to do its work. So the person would do better at first to either increase his/her walking time or to slightly increase the walking pace or alternate it with very light running, then gradually replace the walking with running, then running faster.
Similarly, when I first began swimming, I'd gradually incorporate faster swimming, alternating freestyle and breaststroke until I could do a mile all freestyle.