Freestyle kick

Former Member
Former Member
Does anyone else here NOT kick when they swim freestyle? When I was 19, a coach told me that a lot of "real" freestylers don't kick, which was a surprise to me because every other coach I'd had would yell at me to kick during my events. I grew up thinking I was the odd one out, but maybe someone on here knows what I'm talking about...
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Sometimes that advice departs from the prevailing paradigms, which prompts some to repeat cliched criticisms of TI. Earlier in this thread you posted (in part): "The kick really shouldn't be used for balance as redistributing weight and mass above the waist is a far more efficient way to accomplish that. In short sprints it may contribute something to propulsion, but that is probably neglible." You also used the analogy of a car with front and rear wheels turning at different speeds. My response was: "There is a problem with this analogy. The wheels of the car are turning at a constant speed, but a swimmer has periods of acceleration and deceleration during each stroke cycle. Clearly there are many swimmers with a very propulsive kick, Popov being a good example (able to kick 50m in 28 seconds). As for distance swimmers, Bill Rose has stated that a six beat kick was an essential part of Lars Jensen's success in the 1500 in Athens. Many coaches (Maglischo among them) believe that the primary function of a nonpropulsive kick is to provide balance. Supporting this view is the example of a swimmer with a relatively weak kick who is faster with a pull buoy than full stroke swimming. Presumably hip rotation is no better (and possibly worse) with a pull buoy than without. I have heard it said (Rick DeMont?) that you should build your stroke around your strengths; specifically, if you have a propulsive kick, by all means build the stroke around it." No criticism of TI here, so perhaps you would care to address these points?
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Sometimes that advice departs from the prevailing paradigms, which prompts some to repeat cliched criticisms of TI. Earlier in this thread you posted (in part): "The kick really shouldn't be used for balance as redistributing weight and mass above the waist is a far more efficient way to accomplish that. In short sprints it may contribute something to propulsion, but that is probably neglible." You also used the analogy of a car with front and rear wheels turning at different speeds. My response was: "There is a problem with this analogy. The wheels of the car are turning at a constant speed, but a swimmer has periods of acceleration and deceleration during each stroke cycle. Clearly there are many swimmers with a very propulsive kick, Popov being a good example (able to kick 50m in 28 seconds). As for distance swimmers, Bill Rose has stated that a six beat kick was an essential part of Lars Jensen's success in the 1500 in Athens. Many coaches (Maglischo among them) believe that the primary function of a nonpropulsive kick is to provide balance. Supporting this view is the example of a swimmer with a relatively weak kick who is faster with a pull buoy than full stroke swimming. Presumably hip rotation is no better (and possibly worse) with a pull buoy than without. I have heard it said (Rick DeMont?) that you should build your stroke around your strengths; specifically, if you have a propulsive kick, by all means build the stroke around it." No criticism of TI here, so perhaps you would care to address these points?
Children
No Data