May/June cover of USMS Swimmer

Former Member
Former Member
Anyone else find it a bit odd that the cover of the May/June issue shows "swimmers" wearing flotation vests?
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Originally posted by aquageek Let me answer your questions this way. If I had an interest in other forms of exercise to supplement my swimming, I'd buy a book or magazine on that topic. I don't need my swimming magazine, published 6 X a year to have it's feature story on water aerobics. And, since you asked about my 100 free time I'd much rather have the featured cover story in a swimming magazine dedicated to a total strategy for the 100 with input from some of our better swimmers (Smith, etc) and coaches (Kerry O'Brien, apologies for spelling). I totally disagree that we should stoop to a group that will never swim for fitness or in meets to increase membership. That's not what I want USMS to be. We gonna have noodling classes at Nationals? Might be ok if beer were involved. You can't be all things to all people and I think concentrating on the fitness and competitive bunch is perfectly fine. I'm starting to understand Smith's poll better and better now. Stoop to a group? Are you a better person than they are? Your life is somehow more valuable or worthy of praise? Like I commented to Craig, I am not a big fan of aqua aerobics/noodling but USMS is not just about racing. From what I have seen in USMS Swimmer, most of the content does deal with competition and I suspect that the issue in question has competitive information in it as well. It's not as if the entire issue was devoted to aqua aerobics, was it?
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Originally posted by aquageek Let me answer your questions this way. If I had an interest in other forms of exercise to supplement my swimming, I'd buy a book or magazine on that topic. I don't need my swimming magazine, published 6 X a year to have it's feature story on water aerobics. And, since you asked about my 100 free time I'd much rather have the featured cover story in a swimming magazine dedicated to a total strategy for the 100 with input from some of our better swimmers (Smith, etc) and coaches (Kerry O'Brien, apologies for spelling). I totally disagree that we should stoop to a group that will never swim for fitness or in meets to increase membership. That's not what I want USMS to be. We gonna have noodling classes at Nationals? Might be ok if beer were involved. You can't be all things to all people and I think concentrating on the fitness and competitive bunch is perfectly fine. I'm starting to understand Smith's poll better and better now. Stoop to a group? Are you a better person than they are? Your life is somehow more valuable or worthy of praise? Like I commented to Craig, I am not a big fan of aqua aerobics/noodling but USMS is not just about racing. From what I have seen in USMS Swimmer, most of the content does deal with competition and I suspect that the issue in question has competitive information in it as well. It's not as if the entire issue was devoted to aqua aerobics, was it?
Children
No Data