Is there really a division between masters swimmers? i.e. one camp allied to a more low key fitness oriented approach with low membership growth vs. a meet oriented competitive (elite) camp?
This sounds ridiculous to me. I don't think I've ever run into anyone that acknowledged this debate on a pool deck.
What spawns this rift in Masters swimming? Is this an old guard vs. younger member phenonmenon?
Are there different motivations that exist that create this conflict in terms of the future of USMS? Why can't both coexist?
I say we poll some people out there and find out what they support.
John Smith
Looking at the results from last year's one hour postal championships, I would say that anyone completing 5000 yards is elite. Our coach informed us that we will be swimming this on Saturday.
Our team did a 7000 yesterday. It really wasn't too bad once you got into the groove of it. We made it a charity swim for the Y. Given that I did it, I'm certain that it does not require the elite level.
Looking at the results from last year's one hour postal championships, I would say that anyone completing 5000 yards is elite. Our coach informed us that we will be swimming this on Saturday.
Our team did a 7000 yesterday. It really wasn't too bad once you got into the groove of it. We made it a charity swim for the Y. Given that I did it, I'm certain that it does not require the elite level.
