Is there really a division between masters swimmers? i.e. one camp allied to a more low key fitness oriented approach with low membership growth vs. a meet oriented competitive (elite) camp?
This sounds ridiculous to me. I don't think I've ever run into anyone that acknowledged this debate on a pool deck.
What spawns this rift in Masters swimming? Is this an old guard vs. younger member phenonmenon?
Are there different motivations that exist that create this conflict in terms of the future of USMS? Why can't both coexist?
I say we poll some people out there and find out what they support.
John Smith
Barb - When I first started swimming a few years ago I got a similiar attitude from a tri swimmer. He acted like he was too good to be bothered by questions from newbies. It's ironic, because now I train at a faster pace than he races. And I'm 20 years older.
Barb - When I first started swimming a few years ago I got a similiar attitude from a tri swimmer. He acted like he was too good to be bothered by questions from newbies. It's ironic, because now I train at a faster pace than he races. And I'm 20 years older.
