Is there really a division between masters swimmers? i.e. one camp allied to a more low key fitness oriented approach with low membership growth vs. a meet oriented competitive (elite) camp?
This sounds ridiculous to me. I don't think I've ever run into anyone that acknowledged this debate on a pool deck.
What spawns this rift in Masters swimming? Is this an old guard vs. younger member phenonmenon?
Are there different motivations that exist that create this conflict in terms of the future of USMS? Why can't both coexist?
I say we poll some people out there and find out what they support.
John Smith
Originally posted by Steve Ruiter
and you agree that it is monotonically increasing with age over 18
I certainly don't agree with that. I'll agree that when you get to a certain age it's probably difficult to better your personal bests, but that age is significantly over 18.
Originally posted by Steve Ruiter
and you agree that it is monotonically increasing with age over 18
I certainly don't agree with that. I'll agree that when you get to a certain age it's probably difficult to better your personal bests, but that age is significantly over 18.
