Is there really a division between masters swimmers? i.e. one camp allied to a more low key fitness oriented approach with low membership growth vs. a meet oriented competitive (elite) camp?
This sounds ridiculous to me. I don't think I've ever run into anyone that acknowledged this debate on a pool deck.
What spawns this rift in Masters swimming? Is this an old guard vs. younger member phenonmenon?
Are there different motivations that exist that create this conflict in terms of the future of USMS? Why can't both coexist?
I say we poll some people out there and find out what they support.
John Smith
John, I voted the first option, but it does not fit me. I am not elite, but if USMS grows, great. So though I am one of 8 who voted for the first, I wish there had been a different option. As far as me against the "elite". Most of the elite swimmers I know are very supportive of the likes of me, and are nice helpful people.
John, I voted the first option, but it does not fit me. I am not elite, but if USMS grows, great. So though I am one of 8 who voted for the first, I wish there had been a different option. As far as me against the "elite". Most of the elite swimmers I know are very supportive of the likes of me, and are nice helpful people.
