Mike Ross

From the Boston Globe: In his mid-30s with a job and two young children, Mike Ross of Shrewsbury, Mass. had his doubts about going back to competitive swimming. He thought he might be a Bluefish out of water. ”I figured I’d be an oddball in the sport,” said the 37-year-old Ross, a member of the Bluefish Swimming Club. ”When I thought about swimming with kids, my first thought was that I’d look foolish.” Ross even imagined how events might unfold: The Attleboro-based club is preparing for an intense competition, he’s psyching himself up on the pool deck among the younger swimmers, and someone taps his shoulder. ”Part of me could see someone saying, ’Excuse me, sir, there is a meet going on; could you please step away from the warm-ups?’ I just figured I’d be too old.” Yet, when it came time to make a final decision, Ross decided to go back to something he’s been practicing since he was 7. He dove in headfirst and became a member of the club. He’s happy he did. Swimming with teenage teammates - and against teenage competitors - Ross has found himself regaining the skills he once had as a young swimmer. He was one of four members from the club to qualify for the USA Swimming Championships last week in Federal Way, Wash., where the average age of swimmers was 18. ”I’d say it’s pretty rare that he’s competing, and for someone to swim at Mike’s level, it’s extremely rare,” said Chuck Batchelor, a longtime friend of Ross and head coach of the Bluefish. While his teammates are thumbing through textbooks to keep up with schoolwork on the trip, Ross is staying abreast of the latest news from the high-technology start-up company for which he works. And while his teammates dial parents and friends on cellphones, Ross is also on the line, except he’s making contact with his wife, Kim, and the couple’s children, 8-year-old Jordan and 5-year-old Madison. ”Having a family makes it harder to go away,” he said. ”It makes me homesick, frankly.” But in some ways, the Bluefish Swimming Club has become Ross’s extended family. ”I love Mike; he’s one of my favorite people,” said Eliza Butts, 17, of Weston, a Bluefish member who is also swimming at this week’s USA Championships. ”He almost plays a fatherly role in a way, always talking to people, curious about what’s happening in their lives.” Batchelor, the team’s coach, said the intersection of generations is best seen on van rides to competitions. ”He has this great sense of humor and, because he and I are so close, he has a lot of dirt and stories about me,” said Batchelor, who is 38. ”I’ll be driving the van, he’ll be in the back with the kids, and I’ll be hearing these stories. Thankfully, he’s careful not to go too far. It gives him a connection with them.” ”It’s almost like he’s a kid,” Butts said. ”He interacts with us and jokes around with us. He makes us feel like teammates.” The tie that binds all the Bluefish, of course, is swimming. Ross first leapt from the starting block as a youngster growing up in Somers, Conn. He had a successful college career at Princeton, finishing as a captain while swimming on an NCAA championship relay team that also set a national record. He went on to compete in the US Olympic trials in 1988, 1992, and 1996, but never qualified for Olympic competition. He retired in 1996 at the age of 28, focusing more on full-time work and starting a family. ”In many ways, it was disappointing,” he said. ”I felt I hadn’t reached my potential.” Ross stayed away from swimming for seven years, although it was never far from his mind. Ask his wife, he said, and ”she would say I was pretty depressed about it.” ”At that point, I had swum for 20 years competitively and now all of a sudden I didn’t have that. It was a bedrock in my life. I defined myself as a swimmer all those years and now what was I? I don’t think I had much direction at the time. I wasn’t the same old person.” An unexpected turn of events led Ross back to the pool. In 2003, he ruptured a disc in his back. As part of rehabilitation from surgery, doctors advised him to stay off his feet and to use exercises that would strengthen his back muscles. Swimming was ideal. ”Three weeks later, I was in the water, and I just kept swimming.” In 2004, he competed at a national championship for masters-level swimmers and set two world records. The success surprised him - motivated him, too. He’s currently striving for even higher goals, hoping to qualify for the Olympic trials again. ”Each year I question if it’s getting more difficult or not, but I still have a pretty positive attitude.” Ross acknowledged that his reentry into the sport wasn’t smooth because he ”hadn’t kept up with my strength, let my back muscles go to waste, and had no stomach muscles.” Olympic swimming great Mark Spitz tried a similar comeback in 1992 at age 41. Spitz had retired at 22, after competing in the Munich Games. Spitz’s bid ended when he did not qualify for the Olympics. Ross swims the100-meter butterfly, the 100 backstroke, and the 100 freestyle. Roger Fielding, an exercise physiologist and professor of nutrition at Tufts University, said Ross’s age makes him an underdog against younger elite swimmers. As athletes age, Fielding said, the speed at which their muscles contract declines. Fast contractions are important for short-duration, high-intensity activities such as sprinting, he said. But Fielding added that a high-level veteran swimmer like Ross has an advantage over some younger competitors. ”A lot of the patterning and genetic makeup that made them good swimmers initially in their prime, you don’t lose that,” he said. ”There is a lot to be said for genetic makeup.” Marlene DaCosta, an exercise physiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, doesn’t feel that Ross’s age is necessarily a detriment. The big difference, she said, is ”the demands on time, when you have a family and children, that can take away from training time. In a situation like that, he has to train smarter because he might not train as frequently as he once had time for.” DaCosta said the only factor that could hinder Ross is how quickly his body recovers after a race or practice. The Bluefish discovered this the hard way when Ross was asked to swim back-to-back events in a competition. Ross was scheduled to swim in one race, then another only about seven minutes later. The second race, for which Ross had not had time to recover, was a ”disaster,” said Batchelor, the coach. Ross, who practices each morning at the Boroughs YMCA in Westborough, said he’s awed by the new generation of swimmers. ”I’m interested to see some of the guys who come up now - the Michael Phelpses and Ian Crockers - compared to when I quit swimming the first time,” he said. ”They are so much faster than my contemporaries were. You ask yourself, ’How the heck are these guys doing this?”’ Ross said he enjoys a dual life of swimming and working. He enjoys competing at a high level before trading his swimming gear for 9-to-5 work clothes and switching ”back to regular-guy mode.” Batchelor sometimes wonders how Ross is maintaining such a high level of performance. He appreciates Ross’s competitiveness and boldness in sharing a lane with swimmers half his age. Also, Batchelor said that everything Ross does ”sets the tone for the younger kids; they look at how he takes care of himself and that’s a huge benefit for them to see that.” Butts remembers her surprise when Ross first joined the Bluefish. ”I was shocked to see how great a shape he was in,” she said. ”Most of all, it was really cool to see how far he’s come, how much he loves the sport, and how swimming has affected his life.”
  • The answer to that ? is the Princeton Tigers, the same college that both Coaches of last night NCAA Championship game went to. In fact, Florida Coach Billy Donvan was at the school when those teams won the 200 Medley in 1989 and 1990. I believe Rick Patino was at the school then also. Mike Ross, who is also known as lets race on these forums split :21.81 swimming the 50 back almost completely underwater. That was back in the day where the NCAA had no rules for reaching the surface. I have the race from one of those years on tape and it was the year they swam from lane 1. I believe it was 1990 but I remember it was the same year that Mike Barrowman broke Steve Lunquist's 200 *** American Record going 1:53.XX and that record lasted a long time. One of the factors that was brought up about that relay is that Rich Korhammer had the fastest 50 relay split ever for about 7 years and I don't believe he ever finaled in the 100 *** at the NCAA Championships. Lets Race said on these forums that the original guy swimming freestyle, Eric Osborn had a lung collapse and they substituted Robert Musslewhite, who never broke a :21.00 and somehow they hung on and managed to win with the lead built up by other swimmers. Mike Ross must of had some good races with David Berkoff back then because I believe he was swimming in the Ivy League at that time also.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Great story about Mike Ross. To put his accomplishments in perspective though note that he swims most of the time at the Y. What the article failed to mention is that he swims ALONE at the Y. He does train with the Bluefish but limits his sessions since he has tendency to push himself too hard when training with the "youguns". After all age does have it limits. Also has bit of trivia, Mike's relay was the last national championship title for Ivy swimming.
  • Originally posted by Matt S Mike Ross: great guy. Oustanding swimmer. Really cool he swims with kids and relates to them. All smiles on that score. BUT, am I the only one that is getting a little tired of naturally outstanding swimmers being slapped on the back (again) for being naturally outstanding? Mike was awesome at Princeton, but that was over 15 years ago and he is still getting kudos based on that. What do I mean by that? Look at the article again. He retired in 1996, started swimming again in 2003, and by 2004 was breaking world records again. I'm sure he works hard as a masters swimmer, balancing his training and the rest of his life, so forth and so on. BUT, there are literally thousands of us in USMS who do the same, and have no prayer of ever breaking any kind of record except a personal record. You're referring to a regular newspaper where stories of ordinary people doing ordinay things (working hard without something tangible to show for it) doesn't sell papers. I'm sure you have a great swimming story, Matt, but it wouldn't go in the Boston Globe unless you won a major event or set a major record. That's why we have people like Phil Whitten and Bill Volckening. For decades, they've done a great job showing "ordinary" masters swimmers. I don't think I've ever seen Mike Ross' name in Swimming World or the new SWIMMER magazine, unless it involves nationals.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Mike Ross: great guy. Oustanding swimmer. Really cool he swims with kids and relates to them. All smiles on that score. BUT, am I the only one that is getting a little tired of naturally outstanding swimmers being slapped on the back (again) for being naturally outstanding? Mike was awesome at Princeton, but that was over 15 years ago and he is still getting kudos based on that. What do I mean by that? Look at the article again. He retired in 1996, started swimming again in 2003, and by 2004 was breaking world records again. I'm sure he works hard as a masters swimmer, balancing his training and the rest of his life, so forth and so on. BUT, there are literally thousands of us in USMS who do the same, and have no prayer of ever breaking any kind of record except a personal record. The same admirable personal qualities that lots of other people exhibit don't even raise an eyebrow, and the only difference I can see is that when Mike trains, he can break a record, but the rest of us cannot. Mike can break records because he is a naturally talented swimmer, and now that he is a masters swimmer, he works hard and seriously when he works out. If he was not already naturally talented before he ever started up with USMS in 2003, he would have no shot at breaking the records, like the rest of us. He could work out just as hard and balance his life just as much and relate to the youngsters just as well, as a whole lot of us out there are doing, and receive little if any fanfare. I'm not sure why admirable personal qualities are so much more noteworthy and deserving of praise because the person exhibiting them is the one in a million who can also break a record? The fact that he is already fast has no bearing on the fact he is also a great guy, hard worker, who relates well with the kids.
  • That's a great story. Good for him. I too love to hear everybody's story. The background, for any article, is a necessity. That would have been a poorly written article without it. (That's the English teacher in me :) ) Now the swimmer in me. The fact is that there is always someone faster than you. They may not be competing at the moment, but there is always someone faster (World Record holders aside, although even the World Record holders have been beaten.) If you look back at old Olympic Trials results, Summer Sanders, example, wasn't making finals in all of her events. On any given day at any given time there is probably someone faster (and slower) than us. Unless you're shooting for the Olympic Team, it seems to me that the only person you really should worry about is yourself. Of course it's fun to win, break records, etc., but when it comes down to it, the questions should be, "Did I do my best today?" I still liken swimming to golf. I keep coming back because there is always some way to improve. And I came to the conclusion a long time ago that the only thing I have control over in my swimming is my swimming. I do the best I can given the circumstances I'm given. Sometimes I'm not happy with the results, but sometimes I'm not happy with the circumstances either. I try to learn (even at 35) and go on :) I don't expect any of my efforts to be newsworthy, that's not why I swim. But I do enjoy articles about swimmers, especially in this country, where swimming is the most undervalued sport. The more great publicity the better. Good luck, Mike!
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Great point! I often think about the thousands of great swimmers who don't come back into the sport after their swimming "career" has ended. Why? I know what kept me out for even the few years that I wasn't swimming. A failure to recognize why I enjoy the sport of swimming. It is not the prizes or the medals or the time standards that make this worthwhile. Now that I have come back to swimming, I realize that the real value of swimming is in the learning process, the comraderie and the health benefits. I have a goal which I have mentioned to a few people, of swimming in a meet with my son. As I write this, I realize that I should modify that goal. I want to swim in a Master's meet with my son... when I am 92!
  • Originally posted by letsrace I have a goal which I have mentioned to a few people, of swimming in a meet with my son. As I write this, I realize that I should modify that goal. I want to swim in a Master's meet with my son... when I am 92! Dude, may I say, That's Very Cool! I have day dreamed of swimming with my son in Masters one day.
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Now I feel really bad. Not only did I pick on Mike to make a point, he actually agrees with the point I'm trying to make! Talk about friendly fire. Just food for thought, leaving aside the issue of who gets the ink and the publicity because there are commercial and attention span factors that play into media decisions. There are people like Mike, or the Smith brothers, or Priscilla Kawakami (I use these folks because they are world class masters swimmers, I sorta know them, and they are great people who are emotionally secure enough to not whig out when they come up in conversation) in USMS. Great to talk to, lots of interesting ideas, I've learned alot following them and/or swapping stories, AND they are blazingly fast and routinely set times I couldn't touch if I was in my prime in my 20s. Right now we hear a lot about them in USMS circles. Suppose tomorrow one of them got into an accident, losing a limb, or otherwise suffering a permanent disability. As a result, that person is no longer able to swim world class masters times. I'd be willing to best the interest in how they do at meets would decline dramatically. He/she would still be the same person, just as interesting, intelligent, full of useful information, personable, etc. etc. But, much less in the public eye. WHY? Are we comfortable with the answer? Does this suggest to us any new perspectives on masters swimming? As the wise man once said, just askin'. Matt
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Matt, as coaches like to say, you just have to swim your own race. One of the guys I train with was a national record holder (in Division II) twenty five years ago. He returned to swimming last year (I talked him into it) and in six months caught up to me; now he routinely beats me in practice. Does he work harder than I do? No, we swim the same sets, with the same amount of effort, as far as I can tell. But he was faster than me in college, and he's got a lot of talent. I agree that the Masters swimmers turning in the amazing performances were, for the most part, outstanding swimmers in college. I don't find this surprising. Personally I take comfort in the fact that I'm in better shape than most of my peers, and at age 47 I finally qualified for a national championship in swimming. A top ten time may be out of reach, but I can keep trying. With any luck it will be a long season.
  • Originally posted by letsrace ps. David Berkoff and I never had any good races because he was much faster than me. I would love to see him start swimming again. I predict that he will go sub :47 in the 100 yard back when he returns, even at his *advanced* age. Well, Berkoff is "tuned in." He's been posting on the collegeswimming.com site for the last month or so.