Criticism of TI Principles

Former Member
Former Member
I've noticed at lot of dicsussion in recent threads about TI principles, As you can see from my location, I'm on the other side of the atlantic and TI has started to make an impact over here. I've come across a lot of people in my local University pool who seem to have been mesmerised by the TI message and it is now common for me to see people swimming on their sides with one outstreached arm and a submerged head. When the time comes to breath these guys have their heads so deep from pressing their bouy that they end up lifting it so high that they loose whatever alignment they had in the first place. From talking to them, none of them seem to want to develop a proper kick and build up endurance so they can develop good form. I have decided to post a list of TI priciples and my own critism of these, feel free to add to the list or post a TI defence! TI PRINCIPLE 1 Side to Side Rotation to get into Low Drag Fish-like Position Criticism Rotation is good to get extentsion and a good catch + power into the stroke, Excessive rotation slows down the stroke. TI PRINCIPLE 2 Swim DownHill Press your Bouy Criticism: Holding head too deep creates drag Makes breathing Difficult TI PRINCIPLE 3 No Kicking Criticism Kicking essential to fast swimming + to maintain good form particularly for male swimmers. TI PRINCIPLE 4 Front Quadrant Swimming/ Distance per stroke, Criticism A reasonably high Stroke rate is necessay for fast swimming, Unless you have a very strong kick a glide phase in your stroke will cause decelleration TI PRINCIPLE 5 Drills will make you a better swimmer Criticism Drills are important, but there is no substitute for good quality fast training.
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    My definition of efficiency isn't really important, but it does show that the concept of "efficiency" can be defined and used mathematically. What does efficiency mean to you? Actually, you were talking about "technical conditioning" when I brought this up. Is that different from efficiency? What is its relationship to speed? You would be contradicting yourself to say you don't know, because you have claimed that stroke length is a direct measure of "technical conditioning." Originally posted by Ion Beza ... Stroke Rate -with its physical conditioning- and Stroke Length -with its technical conditioning- ... Again. Why does physical conditioning belong to stroke rate and why does technical conditioning belong to stroke length?
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    My definition of efficiency isn't really important, but it does show that the concept of "efficiency" can be defined and used mathematically. What does efficiency mean to you? Actually, you were talking about "technical conditioning" when I brought this up. Is that different from efficiency? What is its relationship to speed? You would be contradicting yourself to say you don't know, because you have claimed that stroke length is a direct measure of "technical conditioning." Originally posted by Ion Beza ... Stroke Rate -with its physical conditioning- and Stroke Length -with its technical conditioning- ... Again. Why does physical conditioning belong to stroke rate and why does technical conditioning belong to stroke length?
Children
No Data