Criticism of TI Principles

Former Member
Former Member
I've noticed at lot of dicsussion in recent threads about TI principles, As you can see from my location, I'm on the other side of the atlantic and TI has started to make an impact over here. I've come across a lot of people in my local University pool who seem to have been mesmerised by the TI message and it is now common for me to see people swimming on their sides with one outstreached arm and a submerged head. When the time comes to breath these guys have their heads so deep from pressing their bouy that they end up lifting it so high that they loose whatever alignment they had in the first place. From talking to them, none of them seem to want to develop a proper kick and build up endurance so they can develop good form. I have decided to post a list of TI priciples and my own critism of these, feel free to add to the list or post a TI defence! TI PRINCIPLE 1 Side to Side Rotation to get into Low Drag Fish-like Position Criticism Rotation is good to get extentsion and a good catch + power into the stroke, Excessive rotation slows down the stroke. TI PRINCIPLE 2 Swim DownHill Press your Bouy Criticism: Holding head too deep creates drag Makes breathing Difficult TI PRINCIPLE 3 No Kicking Criticism Kicking essential to fast swimming + to maintain good form particularly for male swimmers. TI PRINCIPLE 4 Front Quadrant Swimming/ Distance per stroke, Criticism A reasonably high Stroke rate is necessay for fast swimming, Unless you have a very strong kick a glide phase in your stroke will cause decelleration TI PRINCIPLE 5 Drills will make you a better swimmer Criticism Drills are important, but there is no substitute for good quality fast training.
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Originally posted by knelson And of course all these swimmers are sprinters . It seems to me stroke rate is much more important for sprinters. ... I don't have the book handy. What I quoted is from my notes. Kozulj's 200 back is not a sprint, and in the book it goes how I remember it, Bottom seeing Kozulj doing X strokes per 50, Bottom wanting Y strokes per 50 like the stats in a big meet, working to increase Kozulj's Stroke Rate (against T.I.'s belief), and Kozulj winning 200 back at the 2000 European Championships in a Personal Best of 1:58. Quod Erat Demonstratum regarding Stroke Rate
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Originally posted by knelson And of course all these swimmers are sprinters . It seems to me stroke rate is much more important for sprinters. ... I don't have the book handy. What I quoted is from my notes. Kozulj's 200 back is not a sprint, and in the book it goes how I remember it, Bottom seeing Kozulj doing X strokes per 50, Bottom wanting Y strokes per 50 like the stats in a big meet, working to increase Kozulj's Stroke Rate (against T.I.'s belief), and Kozulj winning 200 back at the 2000 European Championships in a Personal Best of 1:58. Quod Erat Demonstratum regarding Stroke Rate
Children
No Data