Recruiting

Are you talking about USMS? Um, gee, no I'm not, Connie. I do not work for USMS, and I believe you know that. Yeah, I thought so, I was wondering if I didn;t miss something... I was talking about the Kentucky Geological Survey, my employer. Your broad stroke condemnation of government included me, and I was merely trying to point out that far from spending $8 on nails, we're actually pretty careful with spending the taxpayers' money, because guess what, we're taxpayers too. I don't necessarily disagree with everything you've said, but I think your arguments have gone far off topic and some are unfair. Well, the context of the reference to government in this thread was for the most part cities and those branches of government that would have to do with pools and swimming, not necessarily with every branch of government everywhere. I think we need to keep our interpretations general terms within context of the conversation. I mean, seriously, do you think anyone reading the thread about USMS, property taxes and cities closing down the pools will think that the reference to government in the conversation has to do wth the US Geological Survey. Do I need to start using the attorney lingo here to clarify. Let me do this, in this thread wer'e talking about several cities, some schools and a branch of government that is subsidizing several other USAS sports (I think it's a federal entity) are hereinafter and for the purpose of this conversation refered to as "government". Do I really have to recite each one of those seperately every time I want to refer to them on the conceptual level, so someone wouldn't make a mistake of thinking that the context of the conversation is all of government everywhere???

Are you talking about USMS? Um, gee, no I'm not, Connie. I do not work for USMS, and I believe you know that. Yeah, I thought so, I was wondering if I didn;t miss something... I was talking about the Kentucky Geological Survey, my employer. Your broad stroke condemnation of government included me, and I was merely trying to point out that far from spending $8 on nails, we're actually pretty careful with spending the taxpayers' money, because guess what, we're taxpayers too. I don't necessarily disagree with everything you've said, but I think your arguments have gone far off topic and some are unfair. Well, the context of the reference to government in this thread was for the most part cities and those branches of government that would have to do with pools and swimming, not necessarily with every branch of government everywhere. I think we need to keep our interpretations general terms within context of the conversation. I mean, seriously, do you think anyone reading the thread about USMS, property taxes and cities closing down the pools will think that the reference to government in the conversation has to do wth the US Geological Survey. Do I need to start using the attorney lingo here to clarify. Let me do this, in this thread wer'e talking about several cities, some schools and a branch of government that is subsidizing several other USAS sports (I think it's a federal entity) are hereinafter and for the purpose of this conversation refered to as "government". Do I really have to recite each one of those seperately every time I want to refer to them on the conceptual level, so someone wouldn't make a mistake of thinking that the context of the conversation is all of government everywhere???