What is everyone's take on the latest allegations against Armstrong?
OK, I know, not swimming related, sorry.
Parents
Former Member
Gull is right, we are losing the war on Performance Enhancing Drugs. Checking 6 year old samples may put a seed of doubt in today's cheaters - those taking undetectable drugs - because hopefully ONE DAY they will get caught. So I do not care if they are 20 year old samples, if we can now accurately test old samples, then we should. I would think twice about saying "those samples are 6 years old, who cares..."
RE: Lance's private life: Lance's own book is hardly an objective source. That said, who really knows what happened and as Meg pointed out he is entitled to his private life.
Gull is right, we are losing the war on Performance Enhancing Drugs. Checking 6 year old samples may put a seed of doubt in today's cheaters - those taking undetectable drugs - because hopefully ONE DAY they will get caught. So I do not care if they are 20 year old samples, if we can now accurately test old samples, then we should. I would think twice about saying "those samples are 6 years old, who cares..."
RE: Lance's private life: Lance's own book is hardly an objective source. That said, who really knows what happened and as Meg pointed out he is entitled to his private life.
