I think I'm going to have to disagree a bit with my Longhorn teamates Mr. Commings and The Raz on this subject. It's not good to rely on someone coming out of the woodwork in years to come or simply counting on cycles of ebb and flow over years in the sport.
I have been to many age group meets with my kids the last 4 years. In Georgia, Colorado.... and my home the Great state of Ohio, and enrollment of young boys (ages 8-14) is down further than at any time I can remember in the sport. Gone are the days when I grew up and boys ALWAYS outnumber girls in the sport, and its not merely because more girls are swimming now. It's because boys are interested in other sports..... many of which are easier training sports in my opinion.
This is NOT good for the future of men's swimming. I have a bad feeling the next Michael Phelps will be lured into Soccer or some other sport over the coming years... if not already. Swimming.... particularly the governing body USS.... does NOT do an adequate job marketing the sport to the general public during non Olympic years. We ride too heavily on the success of our Olympic performances in hopes of expanding enrollment, and then every 4 years it dies out quickly. With the added cuts of men's swimming programs in the NCAA Div. I level the growth and continued success of US mens swimming in my opinion is in jeopardy over the next 8-12 years. Michael Phelps is a lucky find for the US. I strongly suggest you take a look at some heat sheets for age group meets in your area. You will likely find that there are about 1/2 to 2/3rds the number of boys heats compared to girls heats in the younger age groups. It's shocking. You're looking at the future of our Olympic team in these reduced heats. You can't rely on a Rowdy Gaines to come into the sport late (like age 13) and dominate especially when the numbers are down so much.
USS needs to find money for a larger national campaign with TV time. Why is it I have NEVER been contacted by USS swimming to donate money?! Why is there NO marketing campaign to solicit funds from ex US swimmers from the past 40 years ?!
In my opinion, this is an all out war against soccer and the evil Big 3 sports. For example...... Australia is hurtin' if you take away their 2 big guns Hacket and Thorpe, there is virtually no one in the pipeline that will take over. The US is in a similar but lessor position. It was truly embarassing that the US had absolutely NO ONE in the 100 free at the Olympics. Let me say it again....
IT WAS TRULY EMBARASSING THAT THE US HAD ABSOLUTELY NO ONE IN THE 100 FREE IN THE FINALS AT THE OLYMPICS !
We should OWN that event ! The 100 free IS United States Swimming. It is our history! Our 400m free relay should NEVER lose at the Olympics or World Games as it is a reflection of depth and speed in our programs.
Face it, our volume of great sprinters are pretty bad right now and thats a reflection of basic athleticism and talent by taking (stealing) "athletes" from other sports with raw speed. Gary Hall saved his butt and the US in the 50 free at Greece, but let's face it, he's an archeology find and not a reflection of up an coming talent. We're relying on someone that probably peaked 2 Olympics ago in the sprints.
The picture is not good for the growth of US men's swimming, and we definitely need to do something about it.
John Smith
Parents
Former Member
Bob McAdams and Leonard Jansen,
You've got an optimistic view of the future of men's swimming and that's good. Unfortunately, the facts show that enrollment is down on average nationwide for young males. There are regions of the country with better enrollment and that's good, but taken as a whole the sport doesn't look good for the future of male swimming. And to your comment about girl's success..... Yes, of course girls swimming could use some expansion. I won't light the Title 9 debate here (pros and cons) but I will say this. If mens swimming enrollment continues to decline it will ultimately hurt women's swimming programs as well. Like it or not, public viewership is dependent on selfish male audiences who would rather view men's swimming over women's swimming all things being constant. Not knowing anyone in the pool, men will typicaly pay to watch men compete than pay to watch women compete..... a selfish statement but a reality none the less. You've got to have both men and women's enrollments advancing together.
Paul "the evil" Smith and Loser.
I did mention one solution to the problem. I implied that USS should contact all the ex swimmers it can find for yearly donations to the sport. There must be tens of thousands of adult ex swimmers out there since 1960 with decent sized wallets and good memories of the sport they left behind years ago. A hundred dollar donation a year from each would be a good start.
It's about money. Its always about money. Get more money into the right hands to do EFFECTIVE marketing/advertising to raise awareness of the sport. TV spots are the way to go. Our society is glued to it.
John Smith
Bob McAdams and Leonard Jansen,
You've got an optimistic view of the future of men's swimming and that's good. Unfortunately, the facts show that enrollment is down on average nationwide for young males. There are regions of the country with better enrollment and that's good, but taken as a whole the sport doesn't look good for the future of male swimming. And to your comment about girl's success..... Yes, of course girls swimming could use some expansion. I won't light the Title 9 debate here (pros and cons) but I will say this. If mens swimming enrollment continues to decline it will ultimately hurt women's swimming programs as well. Like it or not, public viewership is dependent on selfish male audiences who would rather view men's swimming over women's swimming all things being constant. Not knowing anyone in the pool, men will typicaly pay to watch men compete than pay to watch women compete..... a selfish statement but a reality none the less. You've got to have both men and women's enrollments advancing together.
Paul "the evil" Smith and Loser.
I did mention one solution to the problem. I implied that USS should contact all the ex swimmers it can find for yearly donations to the sport. There must be tens of thousands of adult ex swimmers out there since 1960 with decent sized wallets and good memories of the sport they left behind years ago. A hundred dollar donation a year from each would be a good start.
It's about money. Its always about money. Get more money into the right hands to do EFFECTIVE marketing/advertising to raise awareness of the sport. TV spots are the way to go. Our society is glued to it.
John Smith
