There has been a lot of discussion since Athens about foreign swimmers training in the United States. Most of them attend U.S. Universities, receive athletic scholarships, and compete at NCAA's. Some notable examples include Duje Draganja (Cal), Fred Bousquet and Kirsty Coventry (Auburn), Markus Rogan (Stanford), and the South African sprinters (Arizona). Some train in the U.S., but don't compete for a university (Inge de Bruijn). All of these athletes benefit from U.S. coaching, from training with U.S. swimmers, and in some cases, from financial support provided by U.S. entities (athletic scholarships). They all turn around and then win medals for other countries.
A couple questions: 1) What do you think about this arrangement generally? 2) Is it of benefit or detriment to U.S. swimming to have these foreign athletes training and competing here? 3) Should we be giving athletic scholarships, which are a scarce resource in swimming, to foreign athletes who will represent their own countries internationally instead of U.S.-born swimmers who will represent us internationally?
I'm sure there are other issues, but these come directly to mind.
Parents
Former Member
Oh, on the issue of foriegn athletes, I think they should get the scholarships. It increases that variety and intellectual experiences of the students attending the university and expands the influence of the university further than it once would.
We need to get rid if title 9. That would increase the number of scholarships for everyone, not just men.
Hook'em
Blue
Oh, on the issue of foriegn athletes, I think they should get the scholarships. It increases that variety and intellectual experiences of the students attending the university and expands the influence of the university further than it once would.
We need to get rid if title 9. That would increase the number of scholarships for everyone, not just men.
Hook'em
Blue
