Today, I swam the 200 yards free in 2:09.11.
This beats my previous best of 2:09.54 from April 1994.
I challenged the 2:09.54 in the past 11 years, over 20 times, many times under what I learned the hard way to be the wrong preparation, and never came close.
My result will be posted officially in the USMS databse.
I won't be able to make the 2005 Short Course Nationals, but hopefully I will make the 2005 Long Course Nationals.
The reason that I bring this success here is that there are some lessons to learn from it:
1.) to pursue virtue and excellence by meeting the intrinsic requirements that come to having a worthwhile goal (in my case, the goal is to stay in my prime intellectually and physically, for longtime), that's intelligence and tenacious work;
I immigrated to U.S. and relocated within U.S. on job skills in science to live my lifestyle;
this lifestyle comprises now, over 39 weeks of the 2004-2005 season so far, of 1,093 kilometers of training (an average of 28.025 kilometers per week, or 30,828 yards per week, no matter the holidays, tapering or illness, that includes kicking, strokes, and technique quotas), the most mileage I slowly built my late starter physiology up to in life, mostly under a Masters club with primarly college and age group swimming expertise, which I searched for and choosed;
I also cross train consistently in weights and running;
2.) I scrutinize self-indulgence and greed (to an employer who was asking me to work overtime like his Japanese employees do, even though I was ahead in schedule in a project, and who thought that I am a slave to him giving me a work visa, I stated "You know, my life doesn't depend on you." and I walked away from a near six-figures salary because it was jeopardizing my swim training; I looked for and found another) and I scrutinize good intentions backed up by feelings without hard data.
2:09.11 and staying in my prime, that's a tribute to 1.) and 2.).
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by Punk
Of course people at 50 can be talented. A talented hardworking 50 year old swimmer would be faster than all of the other 50 year olds. A talented lazy 50 year old and a non-talented hardworking 50 year old would be closley matched, and a lazy non-talented 50 year old would be slower than everyone. (just loose categories, lots of ranges really) But whether a 50 year old could be faster than someone of a different age? Well there are some very different possibilities...
But look, ok it's not likely that someone slightly past their prime like that could break an olympic record, but you never know, things like that tend to happen when people least expect it.
Hey, a heavy, lazy, untalented 50 year old swimmer would be faster than me ... and I'm 35!:p
But I am faster than I was when I started swimming seriously two and a half years ago.
Reply
Former Member
Originally posted by Punk
Of course people at 50 can be talented. A talented hardworking 50 year old swimmer would be faster than all of the other 50 year olds. A talented lazy 50 year old and a non-talented hardworking 50 year old would be closley matched, and a lazy non-talented 50 year old would be slower than everyone. (just loose categories, lots of ranges really) But whether a 50 year old could be faster than someone of a different age? Well there are some very different possibilities...
But look, ok it's not likely that someone slightly past their prime like that could break an olympic record, but you never know, things like that tend to happen when people least expect it.
Hey, a heavy, lazy, untalented 50 year old swimmer would be faster than me ... and I'm 35!:p
But I am faster than I was when I started swimming seriously two and a half years ago.
